Tensions of cable over a pulley

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the tensions in a cable over a frictionless ideal pulley system. Participants are exploring whether the tensions T_1, T_2, and T_3 are equal and the reasoning behind their assumptions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the relationship between the tensions in the cable and the forces acting on the pulleys. Questions about the direction of tensions and the validity of equations related to the system are raised.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of tension versus force, suggesting the use of free body diagrams for clarity. There is an acknowledgment of the assumption that tensions are equal in a frictionless system, but caution is also noted regarding the implications of mass and acceleration on this equality.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the implications of the pulleys being frictionless and the need for them to be massless for the tensions to remain equal. There is an ongoing examination of the definitions and assumptions related to tension in the context of the problem.

arpon
Messages
234
Reaction score
16
[moderator's note: moved to homework forum so no template]

Untitled3.png

This is a frictionless ideal pulley.
Are T_1, T_2, T_3 equal? If so, why? Please explain in details?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Again, let's start with your own view – remembering that both pulleys are frictionless.
 
Philip Wood said:
Again, let's start with your own view – remembering that both pulleys are frictionless.
Probably, I have mistaken the direction of T_1 and T_2. They should be downward.
Then I straightened the cable.
Untitled5.png

So, I assume, T_1 + T_3 - T_2 = 0 .But 'why', I am not sure.
 
Right. Now we have something to go on.

Tensions aren't really forces, though they're closely related. Suppose A and B pull each other in a tug of war, with a rope which at a particular time has a tension of 200 N. That means that the rope pulls A with a force of 200 N, and pulls B with a force of 200 N. These forces are equal and opposite. So in your diagram in post 1, the arrows don't show tensions, but forces. Specifically the two left hand arrows show the forces that the rope exerts on the bottom pulley and the right hand arrow shows the force that the rope exerts on the top pulley. This could cause confusion. It's often best to draw separate diagrams for separate parts of the system showing the forces acting – so-called free body diagrams.

Now your question. The tension in the rope doesn't have a direction (in the same sense that a force has a direction). But it can move freely over the pulleys, and you are right to think that it can be regarded as straight from the point of view of comparing the tensions in the various sections of it. What do you conclude about these tensions? Note that the arrows you put on the straightened rope in post 3 should be removed, as we're dealing with tension, not force. Your equation is also wrong.
 
Philip Wood said:
Right. Now we have something to go on.

Tensions aren't really forces, though they're closely related. Suppose A and B pull each other in a tug of war, with a rope which at a particular time has a tension of 200 N. That means that the rope pulls A with a force of 200 N, and pulls B with a force of 200 N. These forces are equal and opposite. So in your diagram in post 1, the arrows don't show tensions, but forces. Specifically the two left hand arrows show the forces that the rope exerts on the bottom pulley and the right hand arrow shows the force that the rope exerts on the top pulley. This could cause confusion. It's often best to draw separate diagrams for separate parts of the system showing the forces acting – so-called free body diagrams.

Now your question. The tension in the rope doesn't have a direction (in the same sense that a force has a direction). But it can move freely over the pulleys, and you are right to think that it can be regarded as straight from the point of view of comparing the tensions in the various sections of it. What do you conclude about these tensions? Note that the arrows you put on the straightened rope in post 3 should be removed, as we're dealing with tension, not force. Your equation is also wrong.
Untitled4.png

So, now I think T_1 = T_2 = T_3. I explained the reason in the picture. Please check it whether I am right or Wrong.
 
You are right. The tension is the same (call it T) throughout the rope if the pulleys are frictionless. The rope therefore exerts an upward force of 2T on the left hand pulley, a downward force of 2T on the right hand pulley (which is counteracted by an equal and opposite force in the rope holding it to the ceiling) and an upward force of T on mass B.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arpon
Philip Wood said:
The tension is the same (call it T) throughout the rope if the pulleys are frictionless.
Just a word of caution. In the context of pulleys, 'frictionless' usually refers to the axle, not the contact with the rope. That being so, it is not sufficient (when the system is accelerating) for the pulleys to be frictionless. For the tension to be the same both sides, the pulleys would also need to be massless.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K