Tensor Algebras and Graded Algebras - Cooperstein

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on understanding the concepts presented in Bruce N. Cooperstein's "Advanced Linear Algebra (Second Edition)," specifically Section 10.3 regarding Tensor Algebras and Graded Algebras. Participants seek clarification on the nature of multiplication in the context of the map defined in Theorem 10.11 and the properties of the algebra defined in Definition 10.7. The multiplication involved in the products of elements from the algebra is determined by the specific algebraic structure of \(\mathcal{A}\), which is not explicitly defined but follows the general rules of algebras over a field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear maps in vector spaces
  • Familiarity with algebraic structures, specifically algebras over fields
  • Knowledge of tensor products and their properties
  • Comprehension of graded algebras and their definitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear maps in the context of algebraic structures
  • Explore the concept of tensor products in detail
  • Investigate the definitions and examples of graded algebras
  • Review multiplication operations in various algebraic systems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, graduate students in linear algebra, and researchers interested in advanced algebraic structures and their applications.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Bruce N. Coopersteins book: Advanced Linear Algebra (Second Edition) ... ...

I am focused on Section 10.3 The Tensor Algebra ... ...

I need help in order to get an understanding of an aspect of Example 10.11 and Definition 10.7 in Section 10.3 ...

The relevant text in Cooperstein is as follows:
?temp_hash=f50d53053af31f1541d7434c8c2ec289.png

?temp_hash=f50d53053af31f1541d7434c8c2ec289.png


My questions related to the above text from Cooperstein are simple and related ... they are as follows:Question 1

In the above text from Cooperstein ... at the start of the proof of Theorem 10.11 we read the following:

" ... ... Define a map ##S^k \ : \ V^k \longrightarrow \mathcal{A}## by

##S^k (v_1, \ ... \ ... \ , v_k ) = S(v_1) S(v_2) \ ... \ ... \ S(v_k)##

... ... ... "My question is ... what is the form and nature of the multiplication involved between the elements in the product ## S(v_1) S(v_2) \ ... \ ... \ S(v_k)## ... ... ?
Question 2

In the above text from Cooperstein in Definition 10.7 we read the following:

" ... ... An algebra ##\mathcal{A}## is said to be ##\mathbb{Z}##-graded if it is the internal direct sum of subspaces ##\mathcal{A}_k , k \in \mathbb{Z}## such that

##\mathcal{A}_k \mathcal{A}_l \subset \mathcal{A}_{k + l}##

... ... ... "My question is ... what is the form and nature of the multiplication involved between the elements in the product ## \mathcal{A}_k \mathcal{A}_l## ... ... ?Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Cooperstein - 1 -   Tensor Algebra - Theorem 10.11 ... ...     - PART 1     ....png
    Cooperstein - 1 - Tensor Algebra - Theorem 10.11 ... ... - PART 1 ....png
    36.8 KB · Views: 625
  • Cooperstein - 2 -   Tensor Algebra - Theorem 10.11 ... ...     - PART 2     ....png
    Cooperstein - 2 - Tensor Algebra - Theorem 10.11 ... ... - PART 2 ....png
    33.1 KB · Views: 615
Physics news on Phys.org
Math Amateur said:
My question is ... what is the form and nature of the multiplication involved between the elements in the product ## S(v_1) S(v_2) \ ... \ ... \ S(v_k)## ... ... ?

Well, the original assumption is that S is a linear map from the vector space V to the algebra \mathcal{A}. So S(v) is an element of the algebra \mathcal{A}, whatever that is--it's left unspecified. But every algebra over a field \mathbb{F} has its own notion of multiplication and addition. So you're just using that notion of multiplication in interpreting S(v_1) S(v_2)

My question is ... what is the form and nature of the multiplication involved between the elements in the product ## \mathcal{A}_k \mathcal{A}_l## ... ... ?

\mathcal{A}_k and \mathcal{A}_l are subsets of \mathcal{A}. So I think that \mathcal{A}_k \mathcal{A}_l just means the set of all elements x such that x = y z, where y is an element of \mathcal{A}_k and z is an element of \mathcal{A}_l.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur
Thanks Steven ... appreciate your help ...
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K