Tensor equation in Dirac's 1975 book

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter exmarine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Tensor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Dirac's equation 3.4 from his 1975 book, specifically the expression x^{\lambda}_{,\mu}x^{\mu}_{,\nu}=g^{\lambda}_{\nu}. A participant questions whether a factor of 4 should appear on the right side of the equation. However, another participant clarifies that the equation is correct as stated, demonstrating that the expression simplifies to the identity tensor, confirming that the result is 1, not 4, when considering the identity transformation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor calculus
  • Familiarity with Dirac's 1975 book on quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of the metric tensor and its properties
  • Basic concepts of coordinate transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Dirac's equations in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the properties of the metric tensor in general relativity
  • Explore tensor calculus applications in physics
  • Investigate coordinate transformations and their implications in tensor analysis
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying quantum mechanics and general relativity, particularly those interested in tensor analysis and Dirac's contributions to theoretical physics.

exmarine
Messages
241
Reaction score
11
Dirac has equation 3.4 as:

x^{\lambda}_{,\mu}x^{\mu}_{,\nu}=g^{\lambda}_{\nu}

Shouldn't that have a 4 on the right side?

x^{\lambda}_{,\mu}x^{\mu}_{,\nu}=(4?)g^{\lambda}_{\nu}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
exmarine said:
Dirac has equation 3.4 as:

x^{\lambda}_{,\mu}x^{\mu}_{,\nu}=g^{\lambda}_{\nu}

Shouldn't that have a 4 on the right side?

x^{\lambda}_{,\mu}x^{\mu}_{,\nu}=(4?)g^{\lambda}_{\nu}

Nope. let me open the expression for you


\Sigma _ \mu \frac{\partial x^ \lambda}{\partial x ^ \mu} \frac{\partial x^ \mu}{\partial x ^ \nu}=\delta ^ \lambda _ \nu = g ^ \lambda _ \nu
 
Let me open it some more

<br /> \Sigma _ \mu \frac{\partial x^ \lambda}{\partial x ^ \mu} \frac{\partial x^ \mu}{\partial x ^ \nu}=\Sigma _ \mu \delta ^ \lambda _ \mu \delta ^ \mu _ \nu =\delta ^ \lambda _ \nu = g ^ \lambda _ \nu
 
? Wouldn't the first term, for example, be:

\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{0&#039;}}\frac{\partial x^{0&#039;}}{\partial x^{0}}+\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{1&#039;}}\frac{\partial x^{1&#039;}}{\partial x^{0}}+\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{2&#039;}}\frac{\partial x^{2&#039;}}{\partial x^{0}}+\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{3&#039;}}\frac{\partial x^{3&#039;}}{\partial x^{0}}=4?

And all the off-diagonals be 0 of course.
 
Consider the special case of the identity transformation, where all the new coordinates are the same as the old ones. That is, x0' = x0, x1' = x1, x2' = x2, and x3' = x3. Plug this into your equation, and I think you'll see that the result is 1, not 4.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
943
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
709
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K