Terms physicists and biologists use differently

In summary, the speaker is giving a presentation to a group of mathematicians, physicists, and mechanical engineers. The talk will be biology-based and the speaker wants to point out the differences in culture between life science and physical sciences. They plan to have a slide with terms that both groups use, but with different meanings, to lead into a discussion about asking for clarification on terms. Some examples already mentioned include vector, plasma, and differentiate, but others suggested include translation, evolution, decay, selection, free energy, nucleus, cell, filament, conjugate, bifurcation, degeneracy, corona, perturbation, flux, fusion, fission, vertex, proteus, torus, gaussian, normal, real, imaginary, complex
  • #1
Ryan_m_b
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
5,963
721
I'm giving a presentation to a group next week made up of mathematicians, physicists and mechanical engineers. My talk is going to be related to my work so it's going to be very biology based. I want to start the talk pointing out that life science and the physical sciences are very different in their cultures and I thought it would be fun to have a slide with terms both use but completely differently. The point of this is to lead on to saying that if at any point I'm using a term that you know but don't see how it fits then feel free to ask.

Examples I have so far are vector, plasma and differentiate, can anyone think of any others?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How about translation?
 
  • #3
Evolution (of a physical system versus a species); decay; selection
 
  • #4
Cthugha said:
How about translation?


That's a good one, thanks

Nugatory said:
Evolution (of a physical system versus a species); decay; selection

Maybe, I'm leaning more towards ones that won't be obvious or well known if possible. The vector example I got from a lecture recently in which a class of mechanical engineering students hadn't heard of a disease vector before.
 
  • #5
free energy

edit: that was a joke, referencing pseudo-science, but I immediately realized that physicists also use free energy in thermodynamics.
 
  • #6
nucleus
cell
filament
plasma
conjugate
bifurcation
degeneracy
corona
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Is "perturbation" used in life sciences in some technical sense?? If it is, I'm sure it means something else than within physics/maths.

As a general strategy here,I would suggest that you should look at semi-colloquial Greek/Latin loan words that are used in a technical sense, and compare actual technical usages to discover subtle differences in implied meaning.
 
  • #9
flux: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flux_(disambiguation)
fusion/fission?
[STRIKE]plasma[/STRIKE]*
vertex http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertex
[STRIKE]vector[/STRIKE]*
proteus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proteus_(disambiguation)
torus
panda http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PANDA_experiment
matrix
anything else I missed:
https://www.google.com/search?q=dis...iology&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&start=0
ed-
radiation (evolutionary)
parabola http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parabola_(disambiguation)
*finally decided to really read the op...
 
Last edited:
  • #10
gaussian and normal
 
  • #11
Real
Imaginary
Complex
Manifold (this one has the nice property of being different for mathmatics, ME, and general use)
 
  • #13
These probably apply more to chemistry than biology, but: solution, precipitate, reduction.

Also, statistical significance.
 
  • #14
"Proof"

:biggrin:
 
  • #15
Population
 
  • #16
Ryan_m_b said:
The vector example I got from a lecture recently in which a class of mechanical engineering students hadn't heard of a disease vector before.
That reminds me of a joke I saw recently:

Q. What do you get when you cross a mountain-climber with a mosquito?

A. Nothing: you can't cross a scalar with a vector.​

I had to look up the biological meaning of "vector" before I understood the joke.
 
  • #17
DrGreg said:
That reminds me of a joke I saw recently:

Q. What do you get when you cross a mountain-climber with a mosquito?

A. Nothing: you can't cross a scalar with a vector.​

I had to look up the biological meaning of "vector" before I understood the joke.

:rofl:

Okay, that has *got* to be Ryan's first slide! Too funny!
 
  • #18
"Theory".

(I don't think there are any universally accepted definitions, but...)

Physics: A piece of mathematics and some correspondence rules that tell us how interpret mathematical results as predictions about results of experiments. (Short version: "Something that makes predictions about results of experiments"). If the predictions are bad, then it's a bad theory, but it's still a theory. If the predictions are very accurate, then it's considered a good theory even if we're not sure that it really explains anything.

In other sciences: Something that explains a fact. (People often say that it's in this sense that the theory of evolution is a theory).

Outside of science:
1. A statement that's believed to be true.
2. A guess.
 
  • #19
These are all great everyone :biggrin: thanks! I probably won't need any more but feel free to keep them coming for interests sake.

DrGreg said:
That reminds me of a joke I saw recently:

Q. What do you get when you cross a mountain-climber with a mosquito?

A. Nothing: you can't cross a scalar with a vector.​

I had to look up the biological meaning of "vector" before I understood the joke.

Haha I am definitely stealing this for once I've explained vector!
 
Last edited:
  • #20
Date.

Biologist: Phoenix dactylifera
Physicist: time stated in terms of the day, month, and year
General public: a romantic rendezvous
 
  • #21
Does that mean I'm unknowingly a biologist? :biggrin:
 
  • #22
Ryan_m_b said:
I'm giving a presentation to a group next week made up of mathematicians, physicists and mechanical engineers. My talk is going to be related to my work so it's going to be very biology based. I want to start the talk pointing out that life science and the physical sciences are very different in their cultures and I thought it would be fun to have a slide with terms both use but completely differently. The point of this is to lead on to saying that if at any point I'm using a term that you know but don't see how it fits then feel free to ask.

Examples I have so far are vector, plasma and differentiate, can anyone think of any others?

Membrane: in biology, almost always refers to cell or organelle membrane, whereas in Physics, the use is broader. In String Theory, "membrane" (or "brane") may have another arcane definition.

Kinetics: In biology, may refer to enzyme kinetics or sometimes "time-kill kinetics" in microbiology. In Physics, used as a singular form to refer to something related to motion.

Weight: Almost always used as a surrogate for mass in Biology. In Physics, has a very specific meaning relating to the gravitational force on a mass.

Matrix: Used to denote the surrounding substance that envelops something else which can be a cell or an analyte (e.g. extracellular matrix, or specimen matrix). In maths and physics, matrix has a whole other meaning.

Genus: You know the taxonomic use of the term. It's used differently in topology (which I think also has applications in physics).

Differentiate: In biology, used to speak of the specialisation of cells. Different from the mathematical meaning. Of course, there can be quite a lot of calculus in biology, as well.
 

1. What are some examples of terms that physicists and biologists use differently?

Some examples include energy, force, and work. Physicists define these terms in the context of motion and mechanics, while biologists use them to describe metabolic processes and cellular functions.

2. Why do physicists and biologists use these terms differently?

Physicists and biologists have different focuses in their fields of study, which leads to different interpretations and applications of these terms. Physics is primarily concerned with the physical world and its laws, while biology is focused on living organisms and their processes.

3. What are the implications of using these terms differently?

Using these terms differently can sometimes lead to confusion and miscommunication between physicists and biologists. It is important for scientists in both fields to have a clear understanding of each other's definitions and usage of these terms in order to collaborate effectively.

4. Are there any terms that physicists and biologists use in the same way?

Yes, there are some terms that are used in the same way by both physicists and biologists. Some examples include mass, velocity, and acceleration. These terms have consistent definitions and applications in both fields.

5. How can we bridge the gap between the usage of these terms by physicists and biologists?

One way to bridge the gap is through interdisciplinary collaboration and communication. By working together and discussing the different interpretations and applications of these terms, scientists can gain a better understanding of each other's perspectives and reach a common ground in their usage.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
910
Replies
1
Views
817
Replies
59
Views
3K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top