Testing Liquidified HCl: Corrosive Effects & Litmus Paper Results

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of liquidified hydrochloric acid (HCl), particularly its corrosive effects and how it interacts with litmus paper. Participants explore the theoretical and practical implications of HCl in both gaseous and liquid forms, focusing on its acidity and reactivity in the absence of water.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that water is essential for acids to exhibit their properties, suggesting that liquid HCl without water may not behave as an acid.
  • Others argue that pure HCl, whether gaseous or liquid, does not show acidic properties unless it interacts with water or moisture, which it tends to absorb.
  • A participant mentions that pure HCl can undergo self-ionization, similar to other protic liquids, which may imply some level of acidity even in the absence of water.
  • There is a discussion about the conductivity of pure HCl compared to water, with one participant suggesting that lower conductivity in HCl could lead to a higher pH, which raises questions about the definition and applicability of pH outside of aqueous solutions.
  • Another participant cautions against using pH as a measure in non-aqueous systems, suggesting that the Hammett acidity function might be a more appropriate metric for comparison.
  • Some participants clarify that while pH can be used as a measure of proton concentration, it should not be assumed that a pH above 7 indicates a non-acidic substance, especially in different media.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the properties of liquid HCl, particularly regarding its acidity and the implications of pH measurements. There is no consensus on whether pure liquid HCl can be considered acidic without the presence of water, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the definitions and applicability of pH in non-aqueous systems, as well as the dependence of acidity on environmental factors such as temperature and ionic strength.

Seniour Baloc
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I had read that water is essential for any acid. When HCl is dissolved in water, it produces H+ ions which cause the litmus paper to change it colour! But if HCl gas is liquidified and then tested with liquid, what would be the results? As wel as this pure liquid HCl is corrosive or not?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Seniour Baloc said:
if HCl gas is liquidified and then tested with liquid

No idea what you mean. No idea at all.
 
I believe he wants to know the acidic properties of the HCl "liquid" (solvent form).
 
Up to him to explain, not up to us to guess.
 
I am guessing a bit here, but if you managed to keep the water away from this HCl liquid then you would not get the H+/OH- dissociation of acid/alkali chemistry so it should not be acidic as such. Without water it should be less reactive but if it came near anything with water, like flesh, it would be extremely corrosive.
 
Theoretically, pure HCl in gaseous or liquid form does not show any acidic properties, but if you try this in the lab, it will absorb water from the glass beaker, the air(moisture) and even the litmus paper that you would try to test it with. Therefore, in practice it behaves like an acid even in "pure" form.
 
SRJ said:
Theoretically, pure HCl in gaseous or liquid form does not show any acidic properties,
This is not strictly true. Pure HCl undergoes self-ionization, just like water, ammonia, HF, and a host of other pure protic liquids. This is most evident in the fact that pure HCl has a nonzero electrical conductivity (3×10-8 mho/cm, according to this source; cf. 5.5×10-6 mho/cm for pure deionized water). HF is much more extensively studied than HCl in this respect, and it is known that HF has the self-ionization equilibrium: 3HF \rightleftharpoons H_{2}F^{+} + HF_{2}^{-} I would assume the HCl equilibrium is similar. The pH range wouldn't be the same, however.
[EDIT] To be precise, since the conductivity is lower in HCl than in water, you'd expect the obtainable pH's in pure (anhydrous) HCl to be higher (more basic) than in water (surprisingly enough). Two examples: the conductivity of pure HF is higher than pure water, and the obtainable pH's in HF are anywhere from 0 down to -20 or so (extremely acidic). On the other hand, the conductivity of pure ammonia is much lower than pure water, and the obtainable pH's in ammonia range from about 10 to 35 (extremely basic). The reason for this is that the conductivity of the liquid is related to the equilibrium constant for the self-ionization reaction. You might want to search for terms like "self-ionization" and "solvent leveling effect" to understand this better.
 
Last edited:
TeethWhitener said:
To be precise, since the conductivity is lower in HCl than in water, you'd expect the obtainable pH's in pure (anhydrous) HCl to be higher (more basic) than in water

While I understand what you are thinking about, this is a rather dangerous way of using the term "pH". Technically speaking pH is defined only for water solutions, and shouldn't be used in other contexts to avoid ambiguity. The part of "higher pH meaning it is more basic" is exactly what I am talking about, that's comparing apples and oranges.

If anything, it would be better to switch to Hammett acidity function for such comparisons.
 
I understand Borek's caution. But pH is only a -ve log of "proton" concentration and can be used for all systems. Just we cannot assume 7 is neutral, that is specifically for water; generally acids and bases are defined with that 7 in mind.

I take TeethWhitener's "more basic" as just relative term to aqueous HCL; less acidic would have been easier, though both mean same. It is same as saying less protons. Less protons and so higher pH. So, pure HCL can have a pH above 7 and still be "acid"! Also, their reactivity will be different because in water protons stay as H3O+ but in other medium it will stay as something else (in more or less reactive form).

Now we can understand the importance of Borek's caution.
 
  • #10
Kanesan said:
Just we cannot assume 7 is neutral, that is specifically for water

It even doesn't work for water - depends on the temperature and ionic strength.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
22K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
32K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
43
Views
22K