Testing the Continuity of k(x) at x=3: Is lim x->3- k(x) = lim x->3+ k(x) true?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chukie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the continuity of the function k(x) at x=3, specifically examining the relationship between the left-hand limit and the right-hand limit as x approaches 3. Participants are trying to understand the implications of continuity in terms of limits.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of continuity and its relation to limits, questioning how the values of the function affect the limits. There is also confusion regarding the function's definition and continuity across its domain.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts of continuity and limits, with some participants offering clarifications about the relationship between left-hand and right-hand limits. The discussion is productive, with participants engaging in questioning and clarifying assumptions.

Contextual Notes

There are some inconsistencies in the values provided for k(x), which have led to confusion regarding the function's continuity and the limits being discussed. Participants are trying to reconcile these values with the concept of continuity.

chukie
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
k(x) is a continuous function. k(x)=-1 and k(4)=2 then is this statement true:

lim x->3- k(x) = lim x->3+ k(x)


i realli hv no idea. could sumone help me please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does continuous mean in terms of limits? k(x)=(-1) means the function is constant. k(4)=2 contradicts the previous statement. What's the real problem?
 
Dick said:
What does continuous mean in terms of limits? k(x)=(-1) means the function is constant. k(4)=2 contradicts the previous statement. What's the real problem?

sorry i typed the question wrong k(3)=-1
 
chukie said:
sorry i typed the question wrong k(3)=-1

S'ok. But the question is still odd, because the values of the function don't have anything to do with whether the two limits are equal. If a function is continuous at x=3, what can you say about it's left and right hand limits? Do you mean to say k(x) is only defined on the interval [3,4]? Or is it defined and continuous everywhere?
 
Dick said:
S'ok. But the question is still odd, because the values of the function don't have anything to do with whether the two limits are equal. If a function is continuous at x=3, what can you say about it's left and right hand limits? Do you mean to say k(x) is only defined on the interval [3,4]? Or is it defined and continuous everywhere?

k(x) is continuous for all real numbers
 
Fine. Then the values of the function have nothing to do with the problem. What does being continuous tell you about limits?
 
umm I am not exactly sure but the left hand limit should equal the right hand limit?
 
Pretty much. And they both should equal the value of the function at x=3. Kind of a silly question then, yes?
 
yes lol but thank you so much for ur help. it helped cleared things up for me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K