The 38th problem: I'm not getting the result in the book (SHM problem)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pawn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a misunderstanding of simple harmonic motion (SHM) equations, specifically regarding the relationship between displacement, velocity, and acceleration. Participants emphasize the importance of using correct formulas for SHM, noting that velocity is not simply calculated as displacement over time. There is also a focus on the necessity of using LaTeX for clear mathematical communication and correcting errors in displacement values. The conversation concludes with guidance on deriving position and velocity equations based on known parameters like amplitude and period. Overall, the thread highlights the need for clarity in mathematical expressions and understanding the fundamentals of SHM.
Pawn
Messages
18
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
The 38 problem:The result on the book is 10.6cm i keep getting 3.75
Relevant Equations
X(t)=A×cos(w×t)
20220922_224901.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show your work so that we can figure out where you went astray.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
kuruman said:
Please show your work so that we can figure out where you went astray.

kuruman said:
Please show your work so that we can figure out where you went astray.
20220922_232414.jpg
 
You are assuming that SHM is motion under zero acceleration. It is not. The velocity in SHM is not related to position and time by ##v=\frac{x}{t}##. What are the correct expressions for position and velocity in SHM? Your textbook should have those.

And yes, please learn how to write equations in LaTeX. Meanwhile, please do no post pictures sideways.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
How can you get a displacement of 37.5 if the max amplitude is specified as 15?
(This is intended to inspire a sanity check. If you mentally draw this motion in your head, that may help you figure out where you're going wrong.)
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
kuruman said:
You are assuming that SHM is motion under zero acceleration. It is not. The velocity in SHM is not related to position and time by ##v=\frac{x}{t}##. What are the correct expressions for position and velocity in SHM? Your textbook should have those.

And yes, please learn how to write equations in LaTeX. Meanwhile, please do no post pictures sideways.
The only other equation i have is the one for the velocity in an instant of time v(t)=-vmax × sin(w × t).

W-omega
And i don't know what LaTeX is.
 
DaveC426913 said:
How can you get a displacement of 37.5 if the max amplitude is specified as 15?
(This is intended to inspire a sanity check. If you mentally draw this motion in your head, that may help you figure out where you're going wrong.)
3.75*
 
Pawn said:
3.75*
mm OK. Your notes say 3.75, though your problem statement says 37.5.
Not sure if you can still edit post #1.
 
  • #10
Pawn said:
The only other equation i have is the one for the velocity in an instant of time v(t)=-vmax × sin(w × t).

W-omega
And i don't know what LaTeX is.
If your textbook really does not have an expression for the position as a function of time, look it up on the web.

To find how to use LaTeX to write and post equations, go here
https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/
or click the link LaTeX Guide, lower left corner.
 
  • #11
kuruman said:
If your textbook really does not have an expression for the position as a function of time, look it up on the web.

To find how to use LaTeX to write and post equations, go here
https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/
or click the link LaTeX Guide, lower left corner.
Do you have any idea on how to solve it?
 
  • #12
Knowing the period allows you to figure out ω. Knowing the position at t=0 allows you to figure out A. Then obtain x(t) for t=0.1s.
 
  • #13
hutchphd said:
Knowing the period allows you to figure out ω. Knowing the position at t=0 allows you to figure out A. Then obtain x(t) for t=0.1s.
How ?
 
  • #14
Look in your book for the relation between T and ω. Tell me what it is
 
  • #15
hutchphd said:
Look in your book for the relation between T and ω. Tell me what it is
ω=2π/T
 
  • #16
So in your equation for x $$x(t)=A\cos\frac {2\pi t} T $$ Now what is A?
 
  • #17
A is 15cm. Right?
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
  • #18
so t/T is 1/8 for t=0.1s
 
  • #19
hutchphd said:
So in your equation for x $$x(t)=A\cos\frac {2\pi t} T $$ Now what is A?
But if we substitute the values we don't get the result that is in the book.
 
  • #20
Pawn said:
Do you have any idea on how to solve it?
I have lots of ideas how to solve it, but I will back off and let @hutchphd take over. You're in good hands.
 
  • Like
Likes Pawn
  • #21
cos (pi/4)= ? ( that's 45deg)
 
  • #22
hutchphd said:
cos (pi/4)= ?
Do we substitute pi with the value 3.14
 
  • #23
You prefer 2pi/8 ? see #18
 
  • #24
hutchphd said:
You prefer 2pi/8 ? see #18
No sorry i didnt realize it
 
  • #25
hutchphd said:
cos (pi/4)= ? ( that's 45deg)
0.70
 
  • #26
So are you good? I got to go right now but let me know
 
  • #27
hutchphd said:
So are you good? I got to go right now but let me know
Yes thank you so much for helping me .
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and hutchphd

Similar threads

Back
Top