The AGW climate feedback discussion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the skepticism regarding the extent of human impact on climate change, particularly the role of CO2 and fossil fuel use. Key points include the importance of understanding climate sensitivity, specifically the Planck response to CO2 doubling, which is estimated to be around 1 to 1.2 degrees Celsius. The main contention lies in the feedback mechanisms that may amplify or reduce this sensitivity, with some arguing for negative feedback predominance. Participants express interest in exploring feedback complexities and their implications for climate models. The conversation emphasizes the need for a focused examination of feedback processes rather than broader climate science debates.
  • #101
sylas said:
link?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #102
mheslep said:
By PF mentors? Why?

See [thread=367803]New GW/CC Policy[/thread] in Forum Feedbacks and Announcements.

Personally I am opposed to this decision, but I recognize that there's been a lot of thought gone into it and so I'm working with the situation. If you want to express thoughts on the matter, it should be in that thread, I think.

Cheers -- sylas

PS. I have fixed the link with something that should work better for the time being, but it still can't give the full paper without subscription. I've left the doi link as a possible link to try in the future, when the relevant journal issue comes out and it no longer appears in the "in press" link. Thanks for pointing this out.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
34
Views
8K
Replies
36
Views
21K
Replies
184
Views
47K
Replies
10
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Back
Top