The air parcel expands as it rises inside a pipe

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Aleksej
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Pipe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the behavior of an air parcel as it rises inside a pipe, exploring the effects of expansion and mechanical work on temperature and energy. Participants consider two scenarios: one where the pipe's diameter increases with height and another where it remains constant. The conversation delves into the implications of these scenarios on the air parcel's speed, energy, and work done.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that in Situation 1, where the pipe diameter grows, the air parcels expand and do work, leading to a decrease in temperature.
  • Others argue that in Situation 2, where the pipe diameter is constant, the speed of the parcels increases, raising questions about the mechanical work done and energy transformations.
  • A participant suggests that for constant speed in Situation 1, the cross-sectional area must grow proportionally to the decline in gas density.
  • There is a discussion about whether extra mechanical energy exists in Situation 2 and its potential sources.
  • Some participants note that the parcels expand the same amount in both situations and cool similarly, but the direction of work differs based on the pipe's configuration.
  • Concerns are raised about the energy lost during the process and its fate, with suggestions that it may radiate away as heat.
  • Participants discuss the implications of pushing against the pipe walls and how this affects the work done by the air parcels.
  • There is a mention of the atmosphere's behavior as either adiabatic or isothermal during the expansion, indicating a complex reality between these models.
  • Some participants clarify that work is a scalar product and does not have a direction, while others challenge this notion by discussing the implications of force and displacement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the mechanics of air parcel expansion and the implications of different pipe configurations. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on the energy transformations or the nature of work done in each scenario.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in defining the function of the expanding pipe area and the relationship between pressure and density changes. The discussion also reflects uncertainty regarding the exact nature of energy loss and the conditions under which the air parcels operate.

Aleksej
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
The air parcel expands as it rises and this expansion, or work, causes the temperature of the air parcel to decrease.

Imagine that parcels of _dry air_ go up inside the pipe that goes vertically from 0 to 5000 meters.
Suppose that they go up because they are slightly warmer that the air outside.

Situation 1

The pipe internal diameter grows from bottom to the top so the area of cross-section grows proportionally to the decline of pressure outside.
In this case the speed of parcels is constant along the pipe. The parcels expand.
Which mechanical work will they do and will their temperature decrease ?

Situation 2

The pipe internal diameter is constant.
In this case the speed of parcels grows along the pipe. The parcels expand up?
Does this mean that the parcels do mechanical work of pushing upper parcels up?
Does this mean that mechanical energy of parcels grows at the expense of their internal energy ?
Will the parcels be colder then in Situation 1 ?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Situation2: The parcel expands vertically, pushes all the parcels above upwards, while standing on the parcels below.

Situation1: The parcel expands horizontally, pushes all the parcels above upwards, while standing on the parcels below and on the pipe 'walls', which in this case are a little bit 'floors' too.

(But I think that if we want a constant speed of parcels, then the area of the cross-section of the pipe needs to grow proportionally to the decline of density of the gas inside.)
 
Last edited:
jartsa said:
(But I think that if we want a constant speed of parcels, then the area of the cross-section of the pipe needs to grow proportionally to the decline of density of the gas inside.)

Yes, it is what I mean.

Do we have any extra mechanical energy in Situation 2 ?
If yes - where did it come from ?
 
Aleksej said:
Yes, it is what I mean.

Do we have any extra mechanical energy in Situation 2 ?
If yes - where did it come from ?

The parcels expand same amounts in both situations, and they cool the same amount as they expand.

(If we take the point of view of the parcel, then in case2 a parcel pushes on pipe walls that do not move to the direction of the push, while on case1 a parcel pushes on pipe walls that do move to the direction of the push)
 
Last edited:
jartsa said:
The parcels expand same amounts in both situations, and they cool the same amount as they expand.

(If we take the point of view of the parcel, then in case2 a parcel pushes on pipe walls that do not move to the direction of the push, while on case1 a parcel pushes on pipe walls that do move to the direction of the push)

What about extra speed of parcels in Situation 2 ?
 
Aleksej said:
What about extra speed of parcels in Situation 2 ?
I don't know. In Situation1 we have a flow in an expanding pipe, I have some faint idea that according to the Bernoulli's law in such case some of the kinetic energy of the flow gets converted into some other energy ...
 
jartsa said:
(If we take the point of view of the parcel, then in case2 a parcel pushes on pipe walls that do not move to the direction of the push, while on case1 a parcel pushes on pipe walls that do move to the direction of the push)

No move - no work. So all work is done in vertical direction in case 2
In case 1 - all additional volume is at the sides, perhaps all work is done in horizontal direction.
 
Aleksej said:
No move - no work. So all work is done in vertical direction in case 2
In case 1 - all additional volume is at the sides, perhaps all work is done in horizontal direction.

The air parcel is doing work in some kind of exercise machine. That's why 'direction of work' can be said to be horizontal, or it can be said to be vertical.

Like a person working this machine does vertical work, or horizontal:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draisine#/media/File:Drezyna_442.jpg
 
jartsa said:
The air parcel is doing work in some kind of exercise machine. That's why 'direction of work' can be said to be horizontal, or it can be said to be vertical.

Like a person working this machine does vertical work, or horizontal:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draisine#/media/File:Drezyna_442.jpg

Then, the work was done, energy was lost, where is that energy now ?
At some stage it was supposed to be the mechanical energy of an expanding parcel.
What happened to it next?
 
  • #10
Aleksej said:
Then, the work was done, energy was lost, where is that energy now ?
At some stage it was supposed to be the mechanical energy of an expanding parcel.
What happened to it next?

radiated away as heat
 
  • #11
Aleksej said:
Then, the work was done, energy was lost, where is that energy now ?
At some stage it was supposed to be the mechanical energy of an expanding parcel.
What happened to it next?

I said earlier that the air parcel pushes down on the inclined walls of the expanding pipe. I thought that it might be important. Well it is important:

It takes energy to push downwards on a pipe, when said pipe is moving downwards.

Or it takes energy to push oneself upwards, when one is moving upwards relative to the thing that one uses as a step.

(I said earlier that from the point of view of the air parcel it does work by pushing on the walls that are moving apart horizontally. Well that is still true, from the dumb parcel's viewpoint)
 
  • #12
davenn said:
radiated away as heat

??

What radiates and why?
 
  • #13
Aleksej said:
Then, the work was done, energy was lost, where is that energy now ?
At some stage it was supposed to be the mechanical energy of an expanding parcel.
What happened to it next?
Pipes are open to the atmosphere at the top I presume.

The problem you face with the expanding pipe area is that you have no function to describe it.
Except as mentioned as some function of change in pressure, which at the present state in the discussion is unknown.

The atmosphere can be modeled as an adiabatic expansion, or an isothermal expansion as we move up in height.
Reality is somewhere in between.
 
  • #14
jartsa said:
??

What radiates and why?
read all the post !
 
  • #15
jartsa said:
That's why 'direction of work' can be said to be horizontal,
Work is a scalar product (W= D.F) and does not have a 'direction'.
 
  • #16
davenn said:
read all the post !

The post is just 4 words long. I guess some bug deleted some of it.
 
  • #17
jartsa said:
I said earlier that the air parcel pushes down on the inclined walls of the expanding pipe. I thought that it might be important. Well it is important:

It takes energy to push downwards on a pipe, when said pipe is moving downwards.

Or it takes energy to push oneself upwards, when one is moving upwards relative to the thing that one uses as a step.

(I said earlier that from the point of view of the air parcel it does work by pushing on the walls that are moving apart horizontally. Well that is still true, from the dumb parcel's viewpoint)

Do you mean the vertical speed will grow in case 1 ?
It is like you put horizontal spring at the bottom of the conical funnel that expands from bottom to the top
and the spring extends sideways and moves up inside the funnel because it pushes on the sloped walls ? :-)
 
  • #18
256bits said:
Pipes are open to the atmosphere at the top I presume.

Yes

256bits said:
The problem you face with the expanding pipe area is that you have no function to describe it.
Except as mentioned as some function of change in pressure, which at the present state in the discussion is unknown.

As we try to keep a constant speed of parcels then "the area of the cross-section of the pipe needs to grow proportionally to the decline of density of the gas inside".
The pressure is almost equal to outside so the density declines with the altitude as in "normal" atmosphere.
The walls are thin and the heat exchange is possible.
 
  • #19
sophiecentaur said:
Work is a scalar product (W= D.F) and does not have a 'direction'.
wikipedia said:
In physics, a force is said to do work if, when acting, there is a displacement of the point of application in the direction of the force.
 
  • #20
@Aleksej
Read that wiki quote carefully: While force and displacement have direction, work does not.
 
  • #21
The problem is ill defined as it stands and hence any conjectures derived to answer it have to make assumptions as to what may happen

Rather than continuing the discussion, it’s time to close the thread. Thank you all who contributed. For the OP, you have enough here to ponder your problem more and can begin to use some explicit math to come up with an answer.

Closing thread now.

Jedi
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and OmCheeto

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K