The area under a discontinuous & integrable function

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shtephy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of area under a function defined on an interval, specifically addressing whether it is valid to talk about the area for a positive function that is integrable but discontinuous. The scope includes theoretical considerations of integration and definitions of area in mathematical contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that it is reasonable to define the area under a discontinuous function as the integral of the function from a to b, suggesting that the area can still be discussed in this context.
  • Others argue that the notion of area should be restricted to bounded regions and continuous functions, citing a teacher's perspective that the graph of a discontinuous function may not completely enclose the area.
  • One participant believes that if the set of discontinuous points is finite, the function can still be integrated over the interval, implying that the area can be defined.
  • Another participant challenges the teacher's assertion that open disks do not have area, stating that there is no reason to exclude such definitions.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the validity of discussing area in relation to the surface defined by the function, indicating a need for clarification on definitions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definition of area in relation to discontinuous functions. Multiple competing views remain regarding the validity of discussing area under such conditions.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the definitions of area being discussed, particularly concerning the continuity of functions and the nature of the regions involved. The discussion reflects differing interpretations of mathematical concepts without resolving these ambiguities.

shtephy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Does it make sense to talk about the area of the region {(x,y)|x[itex]\in[/itex][a,b];y[itex]\in[/itex][0,f(x)]} for a positive function f defined on an interval [a,b], where a,b[itex]\in[/itex]ℝ and f is integrable on that interval, even if the function is not continuous?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on what you mean by area. It is common to define this area as, in fact, the integral of f from a to b. In that case it makes perfect sense to speak of the area under an integrable, discontinuous function.
 
A. Bahat said:
It depends on what you mean by area. It is common to define this area as, in fact, the integral of f from a to b. In that case it makes perfect sense to speak of the area under an integrable, discontinuous function.

Do you all agree with this?

My teacher says that the notion of area can be used only for bounded regions and we can say that the integral form a to b is that area only if the function is continuous, because the surface is limited by the lines x=a, x=b, Ox and the graph of f and, if f is discontinuous, then its graph will not wrap the upper part of the region completely.

http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/5329/imagu.png

She also says that open disks don’t have area.

On the other hand, I think that the existence of area depends only on the set of points, and, following the definition on Wikipedia (go to Formal Definition, the last point), the set {(x,y)|x[itex]\in[/itex][a,b];y[itex]\in[/itex][0,f(x)]} should have area.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If the set of discontinuous points in an interval is finite, then the function can be integrated over that interval, I believe.
 
Last edited:
Char. Limit said:
If the set of discontinuous points in an interval is finite,
It is, because the function is integrable.
Char. Limit said:
then the function can be integrated over that interval.
It can, for the same reason.

The problem is whether we can talk about the area of that surface or not.
 
shtephy said:
The problem is whether we can talk about the area of that surface or not.

Yes, we talk about area there. The area is just defined as the integral [itex]\int_a^b |f(x)|dx[/itex]. There is no reason not to call that the area.

And open disks DO have an area. I don't get where your teacher is getting all that nonsense.
 
micromass said:
Yes, we talk about area there. The area is just defined as the integral [itex]\int_a^b |f(x)|dx[/itex]. There is no reason not to call that the area.

And open disks DO have an area. I don't get where your teacher is getting all that nonsense.

Thank you.
 
well maybe your teacher is defining area in only a restricted sense, to make your life simpler. ask him/her.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K