The atomic clock on a jetliner experiment

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Hafele-Keating experiment and the implications of relativity, particularly regarding time dilation experienced by clocks in different states of motion and gravitational fields. Participants explore the effects of acceleration and gravitational potential on the rates of clocks in motion relative to stationary clocks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about why the clock on the jetliner is slower compared to a stationary clock, questioning the relative speeds involved.
  • One participant references the twin paradox to illustrate the asymmetry between a stationary observer and a moving observer, emphasizing the role of acceleration in determining who experiences time differently.
  • Another participant notes that gravitational effects significantly influence the experiment, highlighting that the centrifugal acceleration and altitude create asymmetries in motion and gravitational influence.
  • A different perspective suggests placing the stationary clock at the North Pole and the moving clock in polar orbit, arguing that the stationary clock is in an inertial frame while the moving clock experiences centripetal acceleration.
  • One participant mentions that time dilation is affected by gravitational potential, stating that clocks at higher altitudes tick faster than those at lower altitudes, which contributes to the differences observed in the experiment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of the experiment and the effects of relativity. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the roles of acceleration and gravitational effects in time dilation.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the discussion involves complex interactions between motion and gravity, with some assumptions about inertial frames and gravitational potential that are not fully resolved.

jaydnul
Messages
558
Reaction score
15
Something I don't understand about that experiment, or about relativity in general. Why the clock on the jet flying around the world is the slower one. I mean isn't the stationary clock moving the same speed away from the jetliner clock relative to the jetliner clock?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the standard twin paradox. Alice stays on Earth while Bob flies off in a relativistic rocket ship and then returns. There's no symmetry between Bob and Alice. Bob knows he traveled because he experienced accelerations. Alice knows she didn't because she never experienced any accelerations.

The Hafele-Keating experiment is basically the same thing. For simplicity, suppose Alice flies west at such a speed that she exactly cancels out the Earth's rotation, while Bob flies east at the same speed relative to the ground. It's not a matter of opinion who did what. Bob experienced a centrifugal force that Alice never experienced.
 
lundyjb said:
I mean isn't the stationary clock moving the same speed away from the jetliner clock relative to the jetliner clock?
In addition to what bcrowell mentioned the experiment that you are talking about also was significantly affected by gravitational effects. The centrifugal acceleration breaks the symmetry wrt motion, and the altitude breaks the symmetry wrt gravitation.
 
hi lundyjb! :smile:
lundyjb said:
… isn't the stationary clock moving the same speed away from the jetliner clock relative to the jetliner clock?

let's put the stationary clock at the north pole, and the moving clock in polar orbit

the stationary clock has zero acceleration

the moving clock has centripetal acceleration

so the stationary clock is stationary in an inertial frame, and the moving clock isn't

an observer stationary in an inertial frame regards all other clocks as slow :wink:
 
lundyjb said:
Something I don't understand about that experiment, or about relativity in general. Why the clock on the jet flying around the world is the slower one. I mean isn't the stationary clock moving the same speed away from the jetliner clock relative to the jetliner clock?

Experience tells us that on or near earth, given two clocks at the same gravitational potential (altitude) the relevant velocity to use in the formulas for time-dilation is the velocity relative to a non-spinning Earth (eg. relative to the centre of the Earth or the north pole).

This is consistent with all experiments. Notice that there are also a form of time-dilation due to gravity which makes clocks high up in the atmosphere tick faster than clocks on the surface of the earth.

The clock on the jet flying eastwards is thus the slowest, the clock on the jet flying westwards the fastest, and the clock attached to the surface of the Earth comes in between.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K