- #36

DreamWeaver

- 303

- 0

I think you might be right there, RV... There's nothing scientific about it, obviously, but I 'feel' like I'm not far off it. At least that's the hope: just a bit more gruntwork and I'll accidentally stumble across it when least expected.Random Variable said:I haven't thought about it much, but perhaps it can be derived by using the multiplication formula for the Hurwitz zeta function.

It's quite a formidable formula, though... (Headbang)I suspect the relation \(\displaystyle \log G(1+z)-z\log \Gamma(z)= \zeta ' (-1)-\zeta ' (-1,z)\) might also offer a decent starting point.