1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The cauchy problem and the equations

  1. Jan 22, 2010 #1
    Hi everyone!
    again d'inverno!!!
    to tell the truth I don't really understand what is going on in the cauchy problem!

    1)
    in section 13.5 "the cauchy problem", it is said that the field equations can be written as the forms in 13.12 to 13.14
    can anyone tell me how?

    actually I tried to use the riemannian tensor : R_abcd
    then I tried to contract indices a and c
    but there are some gamma terms wich I don not know what to do with.

    2)
    moreover it is said that if you use the equation that transforms g_ab to g_ab prime (at the end of page 175) , you can get to 13.18

    I do not understand how is this one possible:

    1L8kOS.jpg
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 23, 2010 #2
    please somebody help me with it!!
     
  4. Jan 23, 2010 #3
    These equations can be simply verified. Show us what you've done so far so we could be able to help you out! Please use Latex to typeset equations and if you don't know how to do it, use this picture stuff for a quick understanding.

    Your approach is good.

    Catching the glimpse of metric indices carefully, plug (13.17) into the transformation formula to get those equations.

    AB
    AB
     
  5. Jan 23, 2010 #4
    Hi again!
    you are right. the second one was so easy. I derived it correctly.
    but about the first one,I mean equations (13.12)-(13.14) here is what I've done:

    1ObIM0.jpg

    I know that one can do the rest by using gamma definition which is based on the metric.
    but isn't it too long?!
    I feel there is something wrong with my solution as first it had derived the rimannian tensors and then the metric and the derivatives. (13.18)
    so maybe I should do something else...
     
  6. Jan 23, 2010 #5
    I think you have serious problems with the understanding of tensor calculus!

    First off, the Ricci tensor [tex]R_{ab}[/tex] is given by

    [tex]R_{ab}=R^{c}_{abc}=\Gamma_{ab}^{c}_{,c}-\Gamma_{ac}^{c}_{,b}+\Gamma_{ab}^{c}\Gamma_{cd}^{d}-\Gamma_{ad}^{c}\Gamma_{bc}^{d}[/tex].

    Secondly, you can get the Ricci tensor from the following definition:

    [tex]R_{ab}=g^{dc}R_{cabd}[/tex], (1)

    where [tex]R_{cabd}=g_{ck}R^{k}_{abd}[/tex] is the covariant Riemann tensor. Do you know anything about the geodesic coordinates? If yes, split [tex]R_{cabd}[/tex] into two categories of terms, one containg all terms of second order and the other including in all terms of first order. So spending 10 minutes of your time on the expansion of terms after bringing into consideration the geodesic coordinates (for the sake of convenience, as this is not necessary) you'll end up getting a straightforward expression for [tex]R_{cabd}[/tex], only consisting of second derivatives of metric tensor. Then turn to computing the Ricci tensor using (1) which will give you all those equations that you are after by a componential analysis.

    AB
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2010
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: The cauchy problem and the equations
  1. Heat equation problem (Replies: 8)

  2. Wave equation problem (Replies: 22)

Loading...