The chain rule for the Stratonovich integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter docnet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the chain rule for the Stratonovich integral, specifically through the conversion of stochastic differential equations (SDEs) from Itô to Stratonovich form. The equation dX_t=bdt+σ∘dW_t is transformed into Itô's SDE, which incorporates an additional drift term. The use of Itô's formula allows for the computation of d(f(X_t)), leading to a clearer understanding of the relationship between the two integral forms. The professor emphasizes the importance of assuming that the function f is invertible and provides hints regarding the differentiation of f.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stochastic differential equations (SDEs)
  • Familiarity with Itô's lemma and Stratonovich integral
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly partial derivatives
  • Basic concepts of stochastic calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Itô and Stratonovich integrals
  • Learn about the application of Itô's lemma in solving SDEs
  • Explore the implications of invertible functions in stochastic calculus
  • Investigate the role of drift terms in stochastic processes
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, financial analysts, and researchers in stochastic calculus or quantitative finance who are working with stochastic differential equations and their applications.

docnet
Messages
796
Reaction score
486
Homework Statement
Verify the chain rule holds for the 1-d Stratonovich integral.
Relevant Equations
$$df(X_t)=f'(X_t)\circ dX_t$$

where ##X_t## solves ##dX_t=bdt+\sigma\circ dW_t##.
Professor says one way to do this is to convert the equations to Itô form and back.

##dX_t=bdt+\sigma\circ dW_t## converted to Itô's SDE is
\begin{align*}
dX_t=&\left(b+\frac{1}{2}\sigma\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\sigma \right)dt+\sigma dW_t.
\end{align*}
We use Itô's formula to compute ##d(f(X_t)).##
\begin{align*}
d(f(X_t))=& \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial t}f+\left(b+\frac{1}{2}\sigma\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\sigma\right)\frac{\partial}{\partial x}f+\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}f\right)dt+\sigma\frac{\partial}{\partial x}fdW_t\\
=& \left(\left(b+\frac{1}{2}\sigma\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\sigma\right)f'+\frac{\sigma^2}{2}f''\right)dt + \sigma f'dW_t.
\end{align*}
This is an SDE that's solved by ##f(X_t)##, so it can be converted to the Stratonovich form. To do this, we can see that the ##\frac{\sigma^2}{2}f''=\frac{\sigma}{2}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(\sigma f') ## term is the additional 'drift' term that disappears in the Stratonovich form.
\begin{align*}
d(f(X_t))=&\left(b+\frac{1}{2}\sigma\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\sigma\right)f'dt+\sigma f'\circ dW_t\\
=& \left(\left(b+\frac{1}{2}\sigma\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\sigma\right)dt+\sigma \circ dW_t\right)f'\\
=& f' dX_t.
\end{align*}

I'm unsure how to get ##f'\circ dX_t## because I don't think I can factor out ##f'## in the second to last line. Since we have the Stratonovich integral symbol ##\circ##, what is the correct step to take? The professor says we can assume that ##f## is invertible. Also she said remember that ##\frac{\partial}{\partial f}=\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\right)^{-1}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}##, which I'm guessing means an operation that takes ##f## into ##1## . And I didn't use either of these hints the professor gave me, so I'm suspicious.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
well. I can see that I made several mistakes already. I'll post again after spending time with a pen and paper. thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K