The concepts behind different heat transfer equations?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding various heat transfer equations and their applications. The equations mentioned include Q = UA delta T for general heat transfer, Q = UA delta T (log mean temperature difference) for heat exchangers, Q = mC delta T for sensible heat change, and Q = (latent heat of vaporization) x mass/time for phase changes. Clarifications indicate that the first equation is more applicable to convection rather than conduction, while the other equations are correctly identified for their respective uses. Overall, these equations are fundamental to heat transfer and have specific applications, primarily within the field of thermodynamics. Understanding their proper use typically requires formal education in thermodynamics and heat transfer.
Ciocolatta
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Heya,

I'm a little confused about the heat equations and the difference in concepts and applications.

So there's:

Q = UA delta T <- I've used this for general heat transfer, like conduction through walls...

Q = UA delta T(log mean temperature difference) <- I've used that for calculating the overall area required for a heat exchanger, using log mean temp diff if i can assume rate of temperature change throughout is proportinoal and there's no phase change.

Q = mC delta T <- i already forgot what i use this for. its just like...how much energy i put in for sensible heat change right?

Q = (latent heat of vaporisation) x mass/time <- i used that to calc. the amount of heat consumed/released when fluid vaporises/condenses

how else can they be used for, how are they different and what other applications?
thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Well, your question requires way more explanation than I think you realize. It's very hard to give you a concise and, more importantly, a complete answer. To be honest, to understand how to properly use the equations you posted, it takes a couple of classes in thermodynamics and heat transfer. If you've already had that, then maybe we can give you a refresher.

1) This equation isn't used for conduction, unless your U=k/delta_x. This would be more accurate for convection, if your U is the convection heat transfer coefficient.

2) You're right on that one.

3) It's accurate for heat transfer into solids, if c_p = c_v roughly.

4) You've got that one right.

As far as other applications, you can't really use them for something else other than heat transfer. However, those equations have kept engineers busy for a long time, so they're pretty good as they are.
 
Thread 'Can somebody explain this: Planck's Law in action'
Plotted is the Irradiance over Wavelength. Please check for logarithmic scaling. As you can see, there are 4 curves. Blue AM 0 as measured yellow Planck for 5777 K green Planck for, 5777 K after free space expansion red Planck for 1.000.000 K To me the idea of a gamma-Ray-source on earth, below the magnetic field, which protects life on earth from solar radiation, in an intensity, which is way way way outer hand, makes no sense to me. If they really get these high temperatures realized in...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K