The Conservation Laws - Particle Physics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation laws in particle physics, specifically regarding the reaction P + P → K+ + K- + P + P. Participants confirm that while isospin is not conserved in this reaction, it can occur through electromagnetic interactions, albeit weakly. The conversation clarifies that isospin (I) and its component (I3) are crucial for understanding particle interactions, with the strong force dominating kaon pair production. The participants emphasize that isospin does not add linearly and that multiple interaction types can coexist in a single process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics concepts, including conservation laws
  • Familiarity with isospin and its components (I and I3)
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic and strong interactions
  • Basic comprehension of particle reactions and their representations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of conservation laws in particle physics
  • Learn about isospin and its implications in particle interactions
  • Explore the differences between electromagnetic and strong interactions
  • Investigate kaon pair production and its underlying mechanisms
USEFUL FOR

Students of particle physics, educators teaching advanced physics concepts, and researchers interested in the nuances of particle interactions and conservation laws.

12x4
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Question:
Screen Shot 2015-05-07 at 12.32.15.png

Figure 1:
Screen Shot 2015-05-07 at 12.31.53.png


QUESTION ABOVE.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution

:[/B]

P + P → K+ + K- + P + P

Firstly, I just wanted to check that this is correct. I found the answer pretty quickly by googling it but have since spent a long while trying to understand it. I was hoping that someone might be able to affirm what I have learned as I have read so much that I feel like I'm getting everything a bit confused now.

As far as I'm aware everything in this collision is conserved apart from the isospin. Is this okay to do? and does this mean that I can now assume that this is an Electromagnetic Interaction?

Secondly, Figure 1. gives the table we will be given in our upcoming exam.

I was wondering what a few of the table headings are supposed to denote.

In the quark table:
I assume J = spin
I3 = Isospin
then what does I mean?

and then again in the Hadron table:
J = spin?
I = Isospin?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where do you see a change of isospin and how would that be relevant?
The reaction is possible via the electromagnetic interaction, but the electromagnetic interaction is weak. There is another interaction that will dominate that reaction.

Isospin is I, the parameter I3 is its component in "z"-direction.
 
mfb said:
Where do you see a change of isospin and how would that be relevant?
The reaction is possible via the electromagnetic interaction, but the electromagnetic interaction is weak. There is another interaction that will dominate that reaction.

Isospin is I, the parameter I3 is its component in "z"-direction.

Thanks for your reply mfb,

Think this is where i was getting confused.

If the collision is: P + P → K+ + K- + P + P

Then the conservation laws for the isospin aren't conserved?

Following the order of the collision above the isospin would be: 1/2 + 1/2 → 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2, 1 ≠ 2 (according to the table above)

And I believe I read somewhere that if the isospin isn't conserved then it is a electromagnetic interaction.
 
Forgot to say, I now see that kaon pair production must be a product of the strong force. Just trying to understand how and when I need to worry about the isospin. Or can there be two types of interaction happening simultaneously?
 
You cannot add isospin like that. "I" is the magnitude of a vector, those don't add linearly.
12x4 said:
And I believe I read somewhere that if the isospin isn't conserved then it is a electromagnetic interaction.
That does not make sense.
12x4 said:
Just trying to understand how and when I need to worry about the isospin.
Not at all, if you take care of the number of up- and down-quarks in the same way you do it for the other types.
12x4 said:
Or can there be two types of interaction happening simultaneously?
It is possible to have more than one interaction type in the same process, yes.
 
Thank you mfb, think I am there now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K