The Conservation Laws - Particle Physics

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around conservation laws in particle physics, specifically in the context of a collision involving protons and kaons. Participants are exploring the implications of isospin conservation and the types of interactions involved in the reaction.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the conservation of isospin in the given reaction and its implications for identifying the type of interaction. There is also discussion about the meanings of various terms in the context of quark and hadron tables.

Discussion Status

Some participants are providing clarifications regarding isospin and its conservation, while others are exploring the possibility of multiple interaction types occurring simultaneously. There is an ongoing examination of the relationships between different conservation laws and the nature of the interactions involved.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion regarding the conservation of isospin and its relevance to electromagnetic interactions, as well as the need for clarity on the definitions of terms in the provided tables. Participants are navigating through these complexities without reaching a definitive consensus.

12x4
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Question:
Screen Shot 2015-05-07 at 12.32.15.png

Figure 1:
Screen Shot 2015-05-07 at 12.31.53.png


QUESTION ABOVE.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution

:[/B]

P + P → K+ + K- + P + P

Firstly, I just wanted to check that this is correct. I found the answer pretty quickly by googling it but have since spent a long while trying to understand it. I was hoping that someone might be able to affirm what I have learned as I have read so much that I feel like I'm getting everything a bit confused now.

As far as I'm aware everything in this collision is conserved apart from the isospin. Is this okay to do? and does this mean that I can now assume that this is an Electromagnetic Interaction?

Secondly, Figure 1. gives the table we will be given in our upcoming exam.

I was wondering what a few of the table headings are supposed to denote.

In the quark table:
I assume J = spin
I3 = Isospin
then what does I mean?

and then again in the Hadron table:
J = spin?
I = Isospin?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where do you see a change of isospin and how would that be relevant?
The reaction is possible via the electromagnetic interaction, but the electromagnetic interaction is weak. There is another interaction that will dominate that reaction.

Isospin is I, the parameter I3 is its component in "z"-direction.
 
mfb said:
Where do you see a change of isospin and how would that be relevant?
The reaction is possible via the electromagnetic interaction, but the electromagnetic interaction is weak. There is another interaction that will dominate that reaction.

Isospin is I, the parameter I3 is its component in "z"-direction.

Thanks for your reply mfb,

Think this is where i was getting confused.

If the collision is: P + P → K+ + K- + P + P

Then the conservation laws for the isospin aren't conserved?

Following the order of the collision above the isospin would be: 1/2 + 1/2 → 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2, 1 ≠ 2 (according to the table above)

And I believe I read somewhere that if the isospin isn't conserved then it is a electromagnetic interaction.
 
Forgot to say, I now see that kaon pair production must be a product of the strong force. Just trying to understand how and when I need to worry about the isospin. Or can there be two types of interaction happening simultaneously?
 
You cannot add isospin like that. "I" is the magnitude of a vector, those don't add linearly.
12x4 said:
And I believe I read somewhere that if the isospin isn't conserved then it is a electromagnetic interaction.
That does not make sense.
12x4 said:
Just trying to understand how and when I need to worry about the isospin.
Not at all, if you take care of the number of up- and down-quarks in the same way you do it for the other types.
12x4 said:
Or can there be two types of interaction happening simultaneously?
It is possible to have more than one interaction type in the same process, yes.
 
Thank you mfb, think I am there now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K