The daunting job application: how to interpret

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges faced by a graduate student in Mechanical Engineering regarding job applications, particularly the interpretation of job requirements and the value of academic versus practical experience. Participants explore the implications of preferred qualifications and the nature of entry-level positions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that no candidate is perfectly educated right out of school, highlighting the unrealistic nature of ideal candidate profiles often presented in job postings.
  • There is a belief that while many job postings list preferred qualifications, candidates should not be discouraged if they do not meet all of them, as mandatory qualifications are typically more important.
  • Networking and direct communication with hiring personnel are proposed as effective strategies for understanding job roles and improving application success.
  • Concerns are raised about the impartiality of job recruiting processes, with some participants arguing that biases exist and that confidence during interviews can significantly influence hiring decisions.
  • Research experience and publications are discussed as potentially valuable assets, although their relevance compared to industry experience remains uncertain.
  • Participants emphasize the importance of using appropriate keywords from job descriptions in applications, while also cautioning against dishonesty in representing qualifications.
  • Joining professional engineering societies is recommended as a means to gain support and networking opportunities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the value of academic qualifications versus practical experience, the nature of job requirements, and the effectiveness of various job application strategies. There is no clear consensus on these issues, indicating ongoing debate and differing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the limitations of their experiences and the subjective nature of job requirements, suggesting that interpretations may vary based on individual circumstances and industry standards.

joshthekid
Messages
46
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I am in my last year getting my Masters in Mechanical Engineering, with a B.S. in applied physics with minors in biomedical engineering and applied mathematics. I have started to look at job applications, and frankly, they horrify me. Being that I have wide background I often look at job postings and find that I meet the most of the requirements but do not always have preferred requirements. I guess what I am asking, is there really any candidate out there that is perfectly educated right out of school? What do I make of these requirements, should I worry about having these requirements.

Also, even when I search entry level positions a lot of applications prefer 1-2 years working experience. I have never had an internship in industry, but have vast research experience as well as 3 publications. Does this count?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It may or may not count. You simply need to apply and keep applying. Don't neglect networking and career services. After two years and roughly 700 applications the job I finally got was one I did not apply for...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ben Espen, JakeBrodskyPE and atyy
joshthekid said:
is there really any candidate out there that is perfectly educated right out of school?
Probably not.
joshthekid said:
Also, even when I search entry level positions a lot of applications prefer 1-2 years working experience.
They can prefer a lot of things.

Those lists always describe the ideal candidate. That ideal candidate has a PhD exactly on the right topic, worked in 3 different countries, worked with all the software the company uses, has 5 years of working experience in the field and is 20 years old. That ideal candidate is also completely imaginary.

It is fine if you don't match all bullet points. Most points should apply, and things like the degree they want are usually mandatory.
Things like "experience with program X preferred" - yeah, well, it saves some time if you know that program, but you can learn how to use it if you do not.
 
There's one thing for certain: if you don't apply for the job, you won't get it. :wink:
 
Your best best is often to try to get in touch with people who are doing the actual hiring or whom that position would eventually be reporting to and find out as many details as you can about the job. This helps you to (a) learn enough about the position to see if it would really be a good fit, and (b) gives you background information that will help you to shine during the interview process.
 
There is a myth that job recruiting is impartial and devoid of bias. It's just a myth. In fact, it has never been anything but a myth. We paper over many things with personnel clerks (we now call them Human Resource Specialists). Their job is to paper over a steaming pile of legal nonsense with the thinnest veneer of legitimacy that they can achieve. Basically, if you take up the gauntlet, get an interview, look at ease and confident in front of the interviewers, they'll probably hire you.

joshthekid said:
...is there really any candidate out there that is perfectly educated right out of school? What do I make of these requirements, should I worry about having these requirements.

Nope. At least in our business, we see a fresh graduate as nothing but a blank page. Engineering is an interesting field in that yes, it is quite technical, but it is also a very human endeavor. You have to know who your clients are. You have to know who you are designing for. That's not something they can teach in school. The only way you may have gotten some of that is if you had done some internships. Talk that experience up for all it is worth.

Entry level jobs are just that. HR likes to put a few requirements into make it look as if we're being selective, but we're not.

joshthekid said:
Also, even when I search entry level positions a lot of applications prefer 1-2 years working experience. I have never had an internship in industry, but have vast research experience as well as 3 publications. Does this count?

It all counts. Just make sure you hit all the HR keywords. It's like a game of buzzword bingo. You need to find a way to creatively echo all the right key-words and buzz that they used in the job advertisement.

That said, DO NOT LIE! Lies you tell to HR will be discovered. I know someone who lied about her background to HR, got hired, and then it came back to haunt her more than ten years later. She was dismissed from the company (there is much more to that story, but I'm not going to relate it publicly). You can be creative about what you describe in your internships and research experience to show similarities to the work they ask of you. But you should strive for honesty.

And finally, I strongly recommend you join an Engineering society of some sort. There are Young Professional groups in most of them. This is where you go to find work, get advice, meet and greet, and the like. You have a lot going for you. Good Luck!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy and Choppy

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K