The Electric Field of a Uniformly Charged Disk

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at a point P along the central perpendicular axis of a uniformly charged disk with radius R and surface charge density σ. The key equation derived is Ex = kexπσ∫(2rdr)/(r²+x²)^(3/2). A point of confusion arises regarding the transformation of the integral into kexπσ∫(r²+x²)^(-3/2)d(r²), prompting questions about the validity of such calculus operations. The discussion clarifies that this transformation is indeed a standard calculus technique involving the differential of r².

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Knowledge of surface charge density concepts
  • Proficiency in applying the power rule in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn advanced integration techniques in calculus, including substitution methods
  • Explore the applications of the power rule in various integration scenarios
  • Investigate the physical implications of electric fields in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and calculus applications in physics.

Skoth
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A disk of radius R has a uniform surface charge density σ. Calculate the electric field at a point P that lies along the central perpendicular axis of the disk and a distance x from the center of the disk.
electricfieldofauniformlychargeddisk.jpg


Homework Equations



Electric field due to a continuous charge distribution:

ke\int\frac{dq}{r^{2}}\hat{r}

Surface charge density:

σ = \frac{Q}{A}

The Attempt at a Solution



This is an example problem from my book, so I already know the solution. The real question I have is how they go about solving it. For the most part, it makes sense, but there is one small step in their calculation that I am confused by.

They setup their formula as thus: Ex = kex\piσ\int\frac{2rdr}{(r^{2}+x^{2})^{3/2}}. This I understand, but their next step is what throws me off. They rewrite this as:

kex\piσ\int(r^{2}+x^{2})^{-3/2}d(r^{2})

I assume that the d(r2) refers to an infinitesimal value of r2. Yet, what I'm confused by is if this is a normal operation in calculus (for I've never seen it before)? In other words, for any other integrations where you have, say, ∫xdx, could this be rewritten as ∫dx2? More generally, could we treat any integration by way of the power rule like so: ∫xmd(xn), with the solution being \frac{x^{m+n}}{m+n} + C? Or am I completely misinterpreting the calculation?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Skoth said:

Homework Statement



A disk of radius R has a uniform surface charge density σ. Calculate the electric field at a point P that lies along the central perpendicular axis of the disk and a distance x from the center of the disk.
electricfieldofauniformlychargeddisk.jpg


Homework Equations



Electric field due to a continuous charge distribution:

ke\int\frac{dq}{r^{2}}\hat{r}

Surface charge density:

σ = \frac{Q}{A}

The Attempt at a Solution



This is an example problem from my book, so I already know the solution. The real question I have is how they go about solving it. For the most part, it makes sense, but there is one small step in their calculation that I am confused by.

They setup their formula as thus: Ex = kex\piσ\int\frac{2rdr}{(r^{2}+x^{2})^{3/2}}. This I understand, but their next step is what throws me off. They rewrite this as:

kex\piσ\int(r^{2}+x^{2})^{-3/2}d(r^{2})

I assume that the d(r2) refers to an infinitesimal value of r2. Yet, what I'm confused by is if this is a normal operation in calculus (for I've never seen it before)? In other words, for any other integrations where you have, say, ∫xdx, could this be rewritten as ∫dx2? More generally, could we treat any integration by way of the power rule like so: ∫xmd(xn), with the solution being \frac{x^{m+n}}{m+n} + C? Or am I completely misinterpreting the calculation?

Thanks!
\displaystyle d\,\left(f(x)\right)=f'(x)\,dx

So, \displaystyle d(r^2)=\left(\frac{d}{dr}(r^2)\right)dr=2r\,dr\,.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
825
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K