The Electric Field: Understanding its Negative Gradient

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric field is defined as the negative gradient of the electric potential, represented mathematically as E = -∇V. This relationship arises because moving against the electric field results in an increase in potential, indicating that the electric field points from regions of higher potential to lower potential. The derivation involves the Work-Energy Theorem, where the potential difference is linked to work done on a charge, leading to the conclusion that the electric field is the negative rate of change of potential with respect to distance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and electric fields
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically gradients
  • Knowledge of the Work-Energy Theorem in physics
  • Basic concepts of electrostatics, including point charges
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential from the Work-Energy Theorem
  • Learn about the mathematical properties of gradients in vector calculus
  • Explore the relationship between electric fields and electric potential in different coordinate systems
  • Investigate applications of electric fields in real-world scenarios, such as capacitors and electric circuits
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of electromagnetism and electric field theory.

jeff1evesque
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
Can someone remind me why the electric field is defined as the negative gradient times the electric potential, rather than the gradient times the electric potential?

Thanks,


JL
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you move up an electric field, the potential increases.

Suppose that for points A and B, the potential at B is higher. Then moving from A to B, the distance is, say, positive, and so the potential difference is also positive. But then the eletric field is directed from B to A, and so is negative, which is accounted for by using the negative gradient.

I hope that helps.
 
V = \frac{kQ}{r}

\frac{dV}{dr}= \frac{-kQ}{r^2} \times \frac{q}{q}

\frac{dV}{dr} = \frac{ \frac{-kQq}{r^2}}{q} = - \frac{F}{q}

\frac{dV}{dr}= -E \Rightarrow E= - \frac{dV}{dr}
 
jix said:
If you move up an electric field, the potential increases.

Suppose that for points A and B, the potential at B is higher. Then moving from A to B, the distance is, say, positive, and so the potential difference is also positive. But then the eletric field is directed from B to A, and so is negative, which is accounted for by using the negative gradient.

I hope that helps.

That helps a lot, I was looking for a conceptual explanation.

rock.freak667 said:
V = \frac{kQ}{r}

\frac{dV}{dr}= \frac{-kQ}{r^2} \times \frac{q}{q}

\frac{dV}{dr} = \frac{ \frac{-kQq}{r^2}}{q} = - \frac{F}{q}

\frac{dV}{dr}= -E \Rightarrow E= - \frac{dV}{dr}

I will try to understand this later, I'm not sure about that cross or is it cross product.


Thanks guys,


Jeffrey
 
jeff1evesque said:
I will try to understand this later, I'm not sure about that cross or is it cross product.

No cross-product, just multiplication.
 
Here's another way they derived the formula:

Work-Energy Theorem relates the potential difference to work as:

\Delta U=U_{f}-U_{i}=-W

If the "electrical potential energy", U, at infinity is defined to be 0, then the electrical potential energy of a single point charge is defined as:

U=-W

To define the electric potential of a charge, we divide it's energy by it's charge.

V=\frac{-U}{q}

The electrical potential difference from infinity to a point is therefore:

\Delta V=V_{f}-V_{i}=-\frac{W}{q}

Subbing the definition of W from mechanics:

V=- \frac{ \int \textbf{F} \cdot d\textbf{r}}{q}

V=-\frac{1}{q}\int\textbf{F} \cdot d\textbf{r}

V=-\frac{1}{q}\int\frac{kqq}{r^{2}}\cdot d\textbf{r}

V=-\int\frac{kq}{r^{2}}\cdot d\textbf{r}

V=-\int E \cdot d\textbf{r}

Taking the gradient of both sides, you get:

\nabla V=-\nabla\int \textbf{E} \cdot d\textbf{r}

\nabla V=-\textbf{E}

\textbf{E}=-\nabla V
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
966
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K