The Energy and Efficiency of Cross-Country Skiing: A Mathematical Analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the energy and efficiency of cross-country skiing, specifically analyzing the mechanical work required for a skier ascending 300 meters. The minimum mechanical work calculated is 191,100 J, derived from the potential energy formula. The metabolic rate needed for the ascent, given an efficiency of 11%, is determined to be 11.68 W. Additionally, the energy dissipated by friction over a distance of 1200 m, with a friction force of 4.5 N, is confirmed to be 5,400 J.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of potential energy calculations
  • Basic knowledge of mechanical work and power
  • Familiarity with efficiency concepts in physics
  • Ability to perform unit conversions (e.g., time from minutes to seconds)
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about energy conservation principles in physics
  • Study the effects of friction on mechanical systems
  • Explore metabolic rates in various physical activities
  • Investigate the role of efficiency in energy expenditure
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, sports scientists, and fitness enthusiasts interested in the biomechanics of cross-country skiing and energy efficiency in physical activities.

snav96
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
  1. A cross-country skier ascends a peak and rises 300 m vertically during the ascent. Her mass including clothing skis, poles, shoes and backpack is 65 kg.
    1. (a) Find the minimum mechanical work needed to be done by the skier (neglect friction).
    2. (b) Why do we not need to consider the skier’s kinetic energy in part (a)?
    3. (c) What is the metabolic rate needed, if the efficiency for this activity is 11% and it took 30 min to climb up that 300 m? (‘rate’ here means energy/time, i.e. power).
    4. (d) If the mean sliding friction force opposing motion of the skis when slid forward with each stride is 4.5 N, how much energy is dissipated by friction in a distance of 1200 m measured along the path?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



a) Potential Energy = 300 m x 9.8 x 65 Kg = 191100 J

b) because the speed stays constant. there's no change in kinetic energy [/B]

c) amount of efficient energy = 191100 x 0.11 = 21021 J
Power = 21021 / 30 x 60 = 11.68 w

d) ?

can anyone check to see if my answers are correct? and help me with part d? cause i have no idea how to answer part d

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
snav96 said:
A cross-country skier ascends a peak and rises 300 m vertically during the ascent. Her mass including clothing skis, poles, shoes and backpack is 65 kg.
  1. (a) Find the minimum mechanical work needed to be done by the skier (neglect friction).
  2. (b) Why do we not need to consider the skier’s kinetic energy in part (a)?
  3. (c) What is the metabolic rate needed, if the efficiency for this activity is 11% and it took 30 min to climb up that 300 m? (‘rate’ here means energy/time, i.e. power).
  4. (d) If the mean sliding friction force opposing motion of the skis when slid forward with each stride is 4.5 N, how much energy is dissipated by friction in a distance of 1200 m measured along the path?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

[/b]

a) Potential Energy = 300 m x 9.8 x 65 Kg = 191100 J

b) because the speed stays constant. there's no change in kinetic energy

c) amount of efficient energy = 191100 x 0.11 = 21021 J
Power = 21021 / 30 x 60 = 11.68 w
Efficiency is (useful output)/input. The useful output in this problem is the work needed to ascend the 300 m.

d) ?

Can anyone check to see if my answers are correct, and help me with part d Because I have no idea how to answer part d?
Part d is asking you to calculate the work done by friction.
 
vela said:
Efficiency is (useful output)/input. The useful output in this problem is the work needed to ascend the 300 m.Part d is asking you to calculate the work done by friction.
so it is it just 4.5N x 1200m ?
 
Yup.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K