The Exponential of an infinite sum

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around proving an identity related to the exponential of an infinite series in quantum field theory, specifically involving combinatorial aspects of integer partitions. The proposed identity connects the exponential function of a sum to a double summation over partitions, incorporating factorial terms. The initial terms of the series expansion demonstrate a systematic pattern that aligns with the expected outcome of the exponential function. There is a suggestion to shift the conversation to a mathematics-focused forum for more specialized input. The thread highlights the intersection of combinatorics and quantum field theory in addressing complex mathematical identities.
WastedGunner
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
I have a problem that arises in quantum field theory. It involves a problem in combinitorics and about the theory of connected graphs.

Essentially, I am trying to prove an identity involving an exponential of an infinite series with the ways to decompose an integer into the sum of integers.

\exp\left({\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n}\right) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \sum_{partitions} \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{a_i^{n_i}}{n_i ! }

Where the partition is over the ways to write n as a sum of integers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_(number_theory)

\sum_{i=1}^n in_i = n

If you expand out the first few terms of the right hand side, it looks good.

n=0 (I'm taking it to be 1 just to avoid confusion)

n=1

a_1

n=2

a_2 + \frac{1}{2!}a_i^2

cummulative

a_1 + \frac{1}{2!}a_1^2 + a_2

n=3

a_3 + a_1 a_2 + \frac{1}{3!} a_1^3

cummulative

a_1 + \frac{1}{2!}a_1^2 + \frac{1}{3!}a_1^3+ a_2 + a_1 a_2 + a_3

n=4

a_4 + a_1 a_3 +\frac{1}{2!} a_2^2 + \frac{1}{2!} a_1^2 a_2 + \frac{1}{4!} a_1^4

cummulative

a_1 + \frac{1}{2!}a_1^2 + \frac{1}{3!}a_1^3 + \frac{1}{4!}a_1^4 + a_2 + \frac{1}{2!} a_2^2 + a_1 a_2 + \frac{1}{2!}a_1^2 a_2 + a_3 + a_1 a_3 + a_4

As you can see, this seems to be systematically giving us the terms of the exponential.

Any thoughts on how to prove this generally?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Suggestion: this is a math question. Why not move it there?
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
997
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K