1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The failure of the free electron theory of metals

  1. May 20, 2006 #1
    I was woundering?

    why did the free electron theory of metals fail (the free electron model)?
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. May 20, 2006 #2
    why did the free electron theory of metals fail "the free electron of model"
    my effort:
    Because it was unable to answer why the mean free path of electrons reaches 20nm in a good conducting metal "like silver" in room tempereture.
     
    Last edited: May 21, 2006
  4. May 20, 2006 #3
    any answers
     
  5. May 20, 2006 #4
    Who said it failed?
     
  6. May 20, 2006 #5

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    Ashcroft and Mermin did in the whole of Chapter 3 of their book "Solid State Physics".

    Zz.
     
  7. May 20, 2006 #6

    Gokul43201

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The free electron model (as put forth by Drude, and modified by Sommerfeld and others) "failed" because for the most part, electrons aren't completely free. They interact with (i) the lattice, (ii) each other, and (iii) impurities. Drude incorporated (i) into his model in the form of a hard-sphere interaction, but completely neglected the other interactions. Sommerfeld made some corrections to this purely classical model, by ensuring that the electron gas obey Fermi statistics. This fixed some problems (like the overestimates of the electronic heat capacity), but still didn't cover for the missing interactions in the model.

    The free electron model was understood to be an approximation, when it was proposed by Drude. The initial surprise was that it was far more successful than expected (eg: the Wiedemann-Franz Law), particularly in the case of the alkali and alkaline earth elements.

    Due to its limitations, the free electron model was unable to account for things like magnetoresistance, thermal dependence of conductivity, optical properties and the host of many body phenomena that result from electron-electron interactions being of importance.
     
  8. May 23, 2006 #7
    Aren't the "free-electron theory" and the "free-electron model" the same thing?

    You might try looking up the "nearly-free- electron model."
     
  9. May 23, 2006 #8
    Look up chapter three in Ashcroft&Mermin, it just happens to be named "Failures of the Free Electron Model" and probably contains more than enough information for you.
     
  10. May 23, 2006 #9

    Gokul43201

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

  11. May 23, 2006 #10

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    Thread merged.

    ziadett : I strongly suggest you re-read the PF Guidelines that you have agreed to. There is a an explicit instruction that multiple posting is not allowed.

    Zz.
     
  12. May 25, 2006 #11
    sorry man no more multiple posting from me any more
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: The failure of the free electron theory of metals
  1. Free electron metal (Replies: 1)

  2. Free Electron Laser (Replies: 3)

Loading...