The FBD Mystery: Why Isn't Normal Force Along Radial Line?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the normal force in a free body diagram (FBD) related to a cam mechanism. Participants are exploring why the normal force does not align with the radial line, despite initial appearances suggesting otherwise.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the alignment of the normal force with respect to the radial line and discussing the implications of different definitions of the angle ##\psi##. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between the normal force and the curvature of the cam, as well as the correct interpretation of angles in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning the definitions used in the problem. Some have offered clarifications regarding the angle definitions and their implications on the calculations, while others are still grappling with discrepancies in angle measurements and their effects on the results.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific definitions from Hibbeler's book on engineering dynamics, which may differ from the definitions used in the original problem. Participants are also noting the importance of sign conventions in angle measurements and how they affect the interpretation of results.

simphys
Messages
327
Reaction score
46
Homework Statement
The smooth surface of the vertical cam is defined in part by the curve r = (a cosθ + b). The forked rod is rotating with an angular acceleration θ”, and at angle θ the angular velocity is θ’. Determine the force the cam and the rod exert on the roller of mass M at this instant. The attached spring has a stiffness k and an unstretched length l. Given: k = 100 N/m , θ = 45 deg l = 0.1 m , θ’ = 6 rad/s, M = 2 kg , θ” = { 2 rad/s
Relevant Equations
c ylindrical
1672857173772.png

so this is what the FBD is.... but to be fair, to me this one looks as if the normal force in the direction of the radial line, yet it isn't????

1-138-768x435.png

here in the solution, it's not along the radial line, whys that???
 
Physics news on Phys.org
simphys said:
to me this one looks as if the normal force in the direction of the radial line, yet it isn't????

The normal force is not in the direction of the radial line. Here I have distorted the shape of the cam into some other shape to emphasize things. In my distortion, the normal force is more vertical than the radial direction. For the shape given in the problem, the normal direction might be less vertical.

1672860691268.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz, Lnewqban, topsquark and 1 other person
Maybe something I said in the last question mislead you. The normal force should be aligned with the cardioids center of curvature at that point. Thats not necessarily colinear with a radial line from the arms center of rotation to that point.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu and Lnewqban
In the solution of post #1, ##\psi## is defined as $$\psi = \pi + \arctan\left(\frac{r \dot \theta}{\dot r}\right)$$ where I've used dots for time derivatives. Note that for this problem, the argument of the arctangent function is negative due to ##\dot r## being negative.

But, I don't think that the angle ##\psi## as shown in the diagram of the solution given in post #1 corresponds to this definition. Rather, if ##\psi## is defined by the equation above, then ##\psi## would be angle shown in red below

1672868167471.png

The equations for ##F## and ##F_N## in the solution of post #1 are correct for this red ##\psi##.

Note that the angle between the ##r## and ##\theta## directions should be a right angle, but it's not drawn very well in the diagram.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and simphys
TSny said:
In the solution of post #1, ##\psi## is defined as $$\psi = \pi + \arctan\left(\frac{r \dot \theta}{\dot r}\right)$$ where I've used dots for time derivatives. Note that for this problem, the argument of the arctangent function is negative due to ##\dot r## being negative.

But, I don't think that the angle ##\psi## as shown in the diagram of the solution given in post #1 corresponds to this definition. Rather, if ##\psi## is defined by the equation above, then ##\psi## would be angle shown in red below

View attachment 319794
The equations for ##F## and ##F_N## in the solution of post #1 are correct for this red ##\psi##.

Note that the angle between the ##r## and ##\theta## directions should be a right angle, but it's not drawn very well in the diagram.
hey, thanks a lot! I guess I'll just always be checking with ##\psi##. but.. I have another question about this. Because in HIbbelers book engeneering dynamics he uses ##\psi = arctan(r/dr/d\theta)## so that is what I use, but.. the problem here is that I get -72.23 degrees which is different from the angle calculated in the solution. I know for sure that the psi angle is the reason why my answer is wrong, but I can't see why it is wrong.. numerical values: r = 0.4414, ##r/d\theta = -01414## such that ##\psi=-72.23##. I use degrees by the way, not radians
 
FCF32B14-1018-4CA7-A1D7-2DC908C51CA4.jpeg
This is what i have done
 
simphys said:
in HIbbelers book engeneering dynamics he uses ##\psi = arctan(r/dr/d\theta)##
With this definition of ##\psi##, the absolute value of ##\psi## represents the angle shown below
1672940188657.png
You have to be careful with signs. For the shape of your cam, ##dr## is negative when ##d\theta## is positive. As the roller moves along the cam from point ##a## to point ##b##, you can construct the right triangle ##abc## with legs along the ##\hat r## and ##\hat \theta## directions. So, ##\tan |\psi| = \frac{|r d\theta|}{|dr|}##. You can express ##F_{N,r}## and ##F_{N, \theta}## in terms of ##F_N## and the trig functions ##\sin |\psi|## and ##\cos |\psi|##.
the problem here is that I get -72.23 degrees which is different from the angle calculated in the solution
I believe your value of ##\psi = -72.23##o is correct. The angle ##\psi## calculated in the solutions is a different angle than this. In the solutions, ##\psi## is defined as $$\psi = \pi + \arctan\left(\frac{r \dot \theta}{\dot r}\right) = \pi + \arctan\left(\frac{r d\theta}{dr}\right) =180^o
+ (-72.23^o) = 107.8 ^o$$ This is the red ##\psi## that is shown in the diagram of post #4.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
simphys said:
hey, thanks a lot! I guess I'll just always be checking with ##\psi##. but.. I have another question about this. Because in HIbbelers book engeneering dynamics he uses ##\psi = arctan(r/dr/d\theta)## so that is what I use, but.. the problem here is that I get -72.23 degrees which is different from the angle calculated in the solution. I know for sure that the psi angle is the reason why my answer is wrong, but I can't see why it is wrong.. numerical values: r = 0.4414, ##r/d\theta = -01414## such that ##\psi=-72.23##. I use degrees by the way, not radians

In Hibbeler, they just state that if ##\psi## is calculated to be positive, then it measured as a counterclockwise rotation ( with the same sense as ##\theta^+##). If its negative, then its measured clockwise ( ## \theta^-##).
What they did in the solution did not follow that definition explicitly, they flipped it to preserve ##\psi## as measured with the sense of ##\theta^+##

As long as you are aware of it, either works.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
933
Replies
2
Views
1K