The FBD Mystery: Why Isn't Normal Force Along Radial Line?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the misunderstanding of the normal force direction in relation to a radial line in a cam problem. Participants clarify that the normal force is aligned with the center of curvature of the cam, not directly along the radial line. The angle ##\psi## is defined as $$\psi = \pi + \arctan\left(\frac{r \dot \theta}{\dot r}\right)$$, which is crucial for solving the problem accurately. The confusion arises from differing definitions of ##\psi## in Hibbeler's "Engineering Dynamics" and the forum's solution, leading to discrepancies in angle calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of normal force and its application in dynamics.
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates and angular motion.
  • Knowledge of the cam profile and its curvature properties.
  • Proficiency in using trigonometric functions for angle calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of center of curvature in cam dynamics.
  • Learn about the derivation and application of the angle ##\psi## in dynamic systems.
  • Review Hibbeler's "Engineering Dynamics" for different angle definitions and their implications.
  • Practice problems involving normal forces and radial lines in mechanical systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mechanical engineering, particularly those focusing on dynamics and kinematics of mechanisms, will benefit from this discussion.

simphys
Messages
327
Reaction score
46
Homework Statement
The smooth surface of the vertical cam is defined in part by the curve r = (a cosθ + b). The forked rod is rotating with an angular acceleration θ”, and at angle θ the angular velocity is θ’. Determine the force the cam and the rod exert on the roller of mass M at this instant. The attached spring has a stiffness k and an unstretched length l. Given: k = 100 N/m , θ = 45 deg l = 0.1 m , θ’ = 6 rad/s, M = 2 kg , θ” = { 2 rad/s
Relevant Equations
c ylindrical
1672857173772.png

so this is what the FBD is.... but to be fair, to me this one looks as if the normal force in the direction of the radial line, yet it isn't????

1-138-768x435.png

here in the solution, it's not along the radial line, whys that???
 
Physics news on Phys.org
simphys said:
to me this one looks as if the normal force in the direction of the radial line, yet it isn't????

The normal force is not in the direction of the radial line. Here I have distorted the shape of the cam into some other shape to emphasize things. In my distortion, the normal force is more vertical than the radial direction. For the shape given in the problem, the normal direction might be less vertical.

1672860691268.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz, Lnewqban, topsquark and 1 other person
Maybe something I said in the last question mislead you. The normal force should be aligned with the cardioids center of curvature at that point. Thats not necessarily colinear with a radial line from the arms center of rotation to that point.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu and Lnewqban
In the solution of post #1, ##\psi## is defined as $$\psi = \pi + \arctan\left(\frac{r \dot \theta}{\dot r}\right)$$ where I've used dots for time derivatives. Note that for this problem, the argument of the arctangent function is negative due to ##\dot r## being negative.

But, I don't think that the angle ##\psi## as shown in the diagram of the solution given in post #1 corresponds to this definition. Rather, if ##\psi## is defined by the equation above, then ##\psi## would be angle shown in red below

1672868167471.png

The equations for ##F## and ##F_N## in the solution of post #1 are correct for this red ##\psi##.

Note that the angle between the ##r## and ##\theta## directions should be a right angle, but it's not drawn very well in the diagram.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and simphys
TSny said:
In the solution of post #1, ##\psi## is defined as $$\psi = \pi + \arctan\left(\frac{r \dot \theta}{\dot r}\right)$$ where I've used dots for time derivatives. Note that for this problem, the argument of the arctangent function is negative due to ##\dot r## being negative.

But, I don't think that the angle ##\psi## as shown in the diagram of the solution given in post #1 corresponds to this definition. Rather, if ##\psi## is defined by the equation above, then ##\psi## would be angle shown in red below

View attachment 319794
The equations for ##F## and ##F_N## in the solution of post #1 are correct for this red ##\psi##.

Note that the angle between the ##r## and ##\theta## directions should be a right angle, but it's not drawn very well in the diagram.
hey, thanks a lot! I guess I'll just always be checking with ##\psi##. but.. I have another question about this. Because in HIbbelers book engeneering dynamics he uses ##\psi = arctan(r/dr/d\theta)## so that is what I use, but.. the problem here is that I get -72.23 degrees which is different from the angle calculated in the solution. I know for sure that the psi angle is the reason why my answer is wrong, but I can't see why it is wrong.. numerical values: r = 0.4414, ##r/d\theta = -01414## such that ##\psi=-72.23##. I use degrees by the way, not radians
 
FCF32B14-1018-4CA7-A1D7-2DC908C51CA4.jpeg
This is what i have done
 
simphys said:
in HIbbelers book engeneering dynamics he uses ##\psi = arctan(r/dr/d\theta)##
With this definition of ##\psi##, the absolute value of ##\psi## represents the angle shown below
1672940188657.png
You have to be careful with signs. For the shape of your cam, ##dr## is negative when ##d\theta## is positive. As the roller moves along the cam from point ##a## to point ##b##, you can construct the right triangle ##abc## with legs along the ##\hat r## and ##\hat \theta## directions. So, ##\tan |\psi| = \frac{|r d\theta|}{|dr|}##. You can express ##F_{N,r}## and ##F_{N, \theta}## in terms of ##F_N## and the trig functions ##\sin |\psi|## and ##\cos |\psi|##.
the problem here is that I get -72.23 degrees which is different from the angle calculated in the solution
I believe your value of ##\psi = -72.23##o is correct. The angle ##\psi## calculated in the solutions is a different angle than this. In the solutions, ##\psi## is defined as $$\psi = \pi + \arctan\left(\frac{r \dot \theta}{\dot r}\right) = \pi + \arctan\left(\frac{r d\theta}{dr}\right) =180^o
+ (-72.23^o) = 107.8 ^o$$ This is the red ##\psi## that is shown in the diagram of post #4.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
simphys said:
hey, thanks a lot! I guess I'll just always be checking with ##\psi##. but.. I have another question about this. Because in HIbbelers book engeneering dynamics he uses ##\psi = arctan(r/dr/d\theta)## so that is what I use, but.. the problem here is that I get -72.23 degrees which is different from the angle calculated in the solution. I know for sure that the psi angle is the reason why my answer is wrong, but I can't see why it is wrong.. numerical values: r = 0.4414, ##r/d\theta = -01414## such that ##\psi=-72.23##. I use degrees by the way, not radians

In Hibbeler, they just state that if ##\psi## is calculated to be positive, then it measured as a counterclockwise rotation ( with the same sense as ##\theta^+##). If its negative, then its measured clockwise ( ## \theta^-##).
What they did in the solution did not follow that definition explicitly, they flipped it to preserve ##\psi## as measured with the sense of ##\theta^+##

As long as you are aware of it, either works.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
874
Replies
2
Views
1K