The first and second law of thermodynamics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the first and second laws of thermodynamics, specifically addressing potential contradictions in their definitions and implications for energy conservation and efficiency. Participants explore the theoretical and practical aspects of these laws.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • James questions whether the definitions of the first and second laws of thermodynamics are contradictory, particularly regarding the concepts of net and gross heat.
  • One participant explains that the first law emphasizes energy conservation, stating that the energy input equals the energy output in a complete cycle.
  • Another participant clarifies that the second law indicates that to achieve useful work, additional energy (heat) must be supplied beyond what is conserved, implying that no process can be 100% efficient.
  • James expresses understanding that while energy is conserved, practical work requires extra heat input.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the interpretations of the first and second laws, but there is an ongoing exploration of their implications and the nuances of efficiency in energy conversion processes.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not fully resolve the potential contradictions in the definitions of net and gross heat, nor do they clarify the specific contexts in which these laws apply.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in thermodynamics, energy conservation, and the efficiency of energy conversion processes may find this discussion relevant.

jamesd2008
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
In my thermodynamics book it states that the first law is,

" When a system undergoes a complete cycle the net heat supplied plus the net work input is zero"

And then it states that for the second law,

"In any complete cycle the gross heat supplied plus the net work input must be greater than zero"

Are these not contradicting each other or am I miss understanding the gross and net aspects? Could someone please help me try to understand?

Thanks in advance
James
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The first law, as you have quoted, is pretty much saying "the energy you put in must be equal to the energy you get back out again".

The second law says "while the first law still applies, to get something useful out, you need to put the same amount in, plus a bit more".

The Wikipedia article is pretty good.
 
Thats great thanks for your input, So although the energy is conserved, to gain practical useful work extra heat is needed?
 
jamesd2008 said:
Thats great thanks for your input, So although the energy is conserved, to gain practical useful work extra heat is needed?

That is correct. In other words, you can never have an energy conversion device or process which is 100% efficient.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K