- #1

- 55

- 3

The formula for joules is kg x v^2

I dont understand why does the difference exist

and what is the difference between joules and kinetic energy

isnt joule the unit for energy??

Thank you guys for helping me.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- B
- Thread starter jamiebean
- Start date

- #1

- 55

- 3

The formula for joules is kg x v^2

I dont understand why does the difference exist

and what is the difference between joules and kinetic energy

isnt joule the unit for energy??

Thank you guys for helping me.

- #2

- 31,060

- 7,741

- #3

- 434

- 247

As you said, joule is a unit of energy (btw. not only kinetic). The problem is that both equations in your post are wrong. In both of them you mix symbols for physical quantities (velocity) and symbols for units (kg). Have you searched a bit on google for correct equations? Even Wikipedia does a good job for the basic topics like this one.

The formula for joules is kg x v^2

I dont understand why does the difference exist

and what is the difference between joules and kinetic energy

isnt joule the unit for energy??

Thank you guys for helping me.

- #4

- 17,449

- 8,439

$$T=\frac{1}{2} m v^2.$$

Each quantity has a dimension within the used system of units. In the SI units the dimensions are ##[m]=\text{kg}## and ##[v]=\text{m}/\text{s}##. Consequently the dimension for energy is ##[T]=\text{kg} \, \text{m}^2/\text{s}^2=1 \, \text{J}##. Thus the unit Joule is a derived unit, just used as a shortcut and to honour Joule, who did a lot of important work to establish the concept of energy (particularly in thermodynamics).

- #5

- 55

- 3

$$T=\frac{1}{2} m v^2.$$

Each quantity has a dimension within the used system of units. In the SI units the dimensions are ##[m]=\text{kg}## and ##[v]=\text{m}/\text{s}##. Consequently the dimension for energy is ##[T]=\text{kg} \, \text{m}^2/\text{s}^2=1 \, \text{J}##. Thus the unit Joule is a derived unit, just used as a shortcut and to honour Joule, who did a lot of important work to establish the concept of energy (particularly in thermodynamics).

Thanks for your explaination.But i still dont understand why does the 1/2 gets eliminated when it comes to the equation of joule.

- #6

- 55

- 3

i dont understand why does the 1/2 got eliminated in the equation of joule.

- #7

- 55

- 3

As you said, joule is a unit of energy (btw. not only kinetic). The problem is that both equations in your post are wrong. In both of them you mix symbols for physical quantities (velocity) and symbols for units (kg). Have you searched a bit on google for correct equations? Even Wikipedia does a good job for the basic topics like this one.

sorry..i mixed up units and quantities.thats why the equation went wrong

- #8

- 434

- 247

i dont understand why does the 1/2 got eliminated in the equation of joule.

1/2 is dimensionless factor, appearing in the equation for kinetic energy. Once you do a dimensional analysis of this equation, you get what you are calling here "equation of joule". The dimensionless factor can be fully ignored in this analysis, it has no influence on the "composition" of Joule. I suggest you to read this article: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/units.html

- #9

A.T.

Science Advisor

- 11,166

- 2,598

Because it has no units, so it changes nothing in the unit equation.i dont understand why does the 1/2 got eliminated in the equation of joule.

- #10

- 7,545

- 6,689

They are definitions of different things, in short. One Joule is the amount of work done by a force of one Newton moving through a distance of one metre. On the other hand, ##mv^2/2## is the amount of energy possessed by a mass of 1kg moving at 1m/s. Why would you expect these quantities to be the same?i dont understand why does the 1/2 got eliminated in the equation of joule.

- #11

jbriggs444

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 9,656

- 4,308

In this particular case, one can trace the factor of two to a notion of averaging (or to the area of a triangle).They are definitions of different things, in short. One Joule is the amount of work done by a force of one Newton moving through a distance of one metre. On the other hand, ##mv^2/2## is the amount of energy possessed by a mass of 1kg moving at 1m/s. Why would you expect these quantities to be the same?

If you have a 1kg mass decellerating under an applied force of 1 Newton, it will come to rest after an interval of one second. During that second, its

The triangle comes in if you integrate force over distance and look at the area under the curve.

- #12

- 31,060

- 7,741

In the SI units the derived units are always defined as straight combinations of the base unit. The purpose is to avoid any need for conversion factors. So the design of the SI system requires that J = 1 kg m^2/s^2 and N = 1 kg m/s^2 and W = 1 kg m^2/s^3. That is simply one of the rules that the SI committee has agreed to follow in the definition of all the derived units.i dont understand why does the 1/2 got eliminated in the equation of joule.

Now, suppose that the SI committee had decided to allow such conversion factors and suppose they had chosen to define the conversion factor

k = 2 J/(kg m^2/s^2)

Then KE = k m v^2 which is not really any simpler, and PE = k m g h which is less simple, and W = k F d which is less simple, and so forth. It would not simplify the KE equation, and it would make all other energy equations more complicated. Plus everyone would have to remember the conversion factor, which nobody likes.

Last edited:

- #13

- 17,449

- 8,439

Share:

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 157