The Fourier transform of the Fourier transform

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the Fourier transform, specifically examining the result of taking the Fourier transform of a function and then the Fourier transform of that result. The subject area is Fourier analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of taking the Fourier transform twice, with attempts to manipulate the integral expressions involved. Questions arise regarding the meaning of "suitably regular" functions and the proper treatment of variables in the context of the transforms.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections regarding variable substitutions and the definitions involved. Some participants express uncertainty about the validity of their manipulations, while others seek clarification on foundational concepts.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential confusion regarding the use of dummy variables in integrals and the conditions under which the Fourier transform exists. The term "suitably regular" is also under examination, indicating a need for clarity on the prerequisites for the transforms discussed.

Poopsilon
Messages
288
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Let f be a suitably regular function on ℝ. (whatever that means).

What function do we obtain when we take the Fourier transform of the Fourier transform of f?

Homework Equations



[tex]F(s) = \int_{x=-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)e^{-2\pi isx}dx[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\int_{x=-\infty}^{\infty}F(s)e^{-2\pi isx}dx = F(s)\int_{x=-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-2\pi isx}dx = F(s)[\frac{-e^{-2\pi isx}}{2\pi is}]_{x=-\infty}^{\infty} = \frac{F(s)i}{2\pi s}[e^{-2\pi isx}]_{x=-\infty}^{\infty}[/tex]

But this simply oscillates indefinitely around a complex circle as x goes to negative infinity and infinity, where have I gone wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
when taking the Fourier transform of F(s), you must treat "s" as "x" when you substitute into the formula
 
Thanks sunjin09, could you also tell me what 'suitably regular' means?
 
Poopsilon said:
Thanks sunjin09, could you also tell me what 'suitably regular' means?

It means the Fourier transform exists, and the inverse transform gives back to the original function.
 
Ok, here's what I've got now:

[tex]\int_{x=-\infty}^{\infty}F(x)e^{-2\pi isx}dx = \int_{y=-\infty}^{\infty}(\int_{x=-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)e^{-2\pi ix^2}dx)e^{-2\pi isy}dy = \int_{x=-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)e^{-2\pi ix^2}(\int_{y=-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-2\pi isy}dy)dx = F(s)\int_{x=-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)e^{-2\pi ix^2}dx[/tex]

Is this it, or can I simplify more?

Edit: Actually this isn't right, I think I may have made some illegal moves with the dummy variables.. Let's try this:

[tex]\int_{x=-\infty}^{\infty}F(x)e^{-2\pi isx}dx = \int_{y=-\infty}^{\infty}(\int_{x=-\infty}^{\infty}f(y)e^{-2\pi ixy}dx)e^{-2\pi isy}dy = \int_{x=-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-2\pi ixy}(\int_{y=-\infty}^{\infty}f(y)e^{-2\pi isy}dy)dx = F(s)\int_{x=-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)e^{-2\pi ixy}dx[/tex]
 
Last edited:
When you write F(s) as F(x), you must write f(x) as say, f(u), don't use the same symbol for different quantities, the answer is very simple, just be careful with substitutions
 
Ok is the answer then, F(s)F(r)?
 
actually I think it's f(-x), is this correct?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K