The Fundamental Assumption of Statistical Mechanics

In summary: The assumption is made that all accessible micro states are equally probable.2. The assumption is made that all states are equally probable.
  • #1
cdot
45
0
Fundamental assumtption:
"a closed system is equally likely to be in any of its g accessible micro- states, and all accessible micro- states are assumed to be equally probable."

There's just a few things I don't understand about this,

1. Isn't saying that a closed system is equally likely to be in any of it's g accesible micro-states the exact same thing as saying that all accesible micro-states are equally probable? Why say both? Isn't that redundant?

2. Am I to assume that this definition applies only to closed systems in equlibrium throughout the system itself? For example, at a given total energy, volume, and number of particles, common sense says that a microstate corresponding to most of the energy of the molecules in this room being concentrated in some corner is NOT just as likely as the energy being distributed evenely. But according to the fundamental assumption, as long as the properties of the system are compatible with the system parameters then the micro-state is accesible and equally probable. So even if all the energy of the molecules in a room were concentrated in one corner, as long as the TOTAL energy, volume, and number of particles were compatible with system parameters, then this state is accesible (but it should not be equally probable?).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
1. No. If a state is accessible by the system it does not mean that the probability to find the system in that state is the same as finding it in an other one.

2. A gas of ideal particles, what are the micro states? they are the positions and the velocities of every single particle.
cdot said:
Am I to assume that this definition applies only to closed systems in equlibrium throughout the system itself?
If you start talking about thermal equilibrium than the micro states are probably not equally probable: you have to follow the Maxwell/Boltzmann distribution.
cdot said:
most of the energy of the molecules in this room being concentrated in some corner
is not a micro state.
 
  • #3
You probably understand this by now, but to answer your second question, the reason it's very unlikely to be found in a state in which all of the atoms are in one corner is that there are (relatively) few of those states, compared to the number of homogeneous ones.

The simple analogy is tossing a million coins. Every sequence HHTTHTHTTHHT... is as likely as any other, but there are far more sequences which have, say 500,000 heads and 500,000 tails, than there are sequences which have 1,000,000 heads and no tails (there's only one of those). And so it's true that HHHHHHHH... is just as likely as any other sequence, but it's also true that you're far more likely to get 500,000 heads and 500,000 tails (in some order). There's no contradiction here.

On the other hand, the assumption in statistical mechanics, that all states are equally probable is a bit harder to justify (that's why we assume it :) ). It's related to the ergodic hypothesis (specifically, the ergodicity of the microcanonical ensemble - actually to some people this just is the ergodic hypothesis) which is fundamentally a very, very hard mathematical problem about measure-preserving maps. But some partial results from that field (e.g. Von Neumann's work) can give us confidence that it holds for most systems we'd expect it to (gases, liquids, etc.).
 

What is the fundamental assumption of statistical mechanics?

The fundamental assumption of statistical mechanics is that the behavior of a large system of particles can be described by the statistical behavior of its individual constituents.

Why is the fundamental assumption important?

The fundamental assumption is important because it allows us to use statistical methods to understand and predict the behavior of large systems, which would otherwise be impossible using traditional methods.

How is the fundamental assumption applied in scientific research?

The fundamental assumption is used in a variety of scientific fields, including physics, chemistry, and biology, to study and understand the behavior of complex systems. It is also used in engineering and technology to design and optimize systems.

What are the limitations of the fundamental assumption?

The fundamental assumption is limited in its applicability to large systems with a large number of particles. It may not accurately describe the behavior of small systems or systems with strong interactions between particles.

Are there any alternative theories to the fundamental assumption?

There are alternative theories to the fundamental assumption, such as quantum mechanics, which can describe the behavior of small systems and systems with strong interactions. However, statistical mechanics remains a widely used and successful approach in many areas of science and technology.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
29
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
3
Views
800
  • Classical Physics
Replies
5
Views
922
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
29
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
389
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
777
Back
Top