I The gravitational center of the Earth

AI Thread Summary
Gravitational forces are nullified near the Earth's center, making the gravitational field's influence undetectable. The Moon's gravitational field does not shift the area of zero gravity away from the Earth's center; rather, the barycenter of the Earth-Moon system is located about 1,700 km below the Earth's surface. Objects at this barycenter would still experience gravitational attraction towards the Earth's center. The Earth and Moon orbit around this barycenter, but this does not change where gravitational forces cancel out within the Earth. Ultimately, all objects inside the Earth are in free fall relative to the Moon, but not relative to the Earth itself.
qnt200
Messages
28
Reaction score
2
We know that gravitational forces are nullified near the center of the Earth, so the gravitational field's influence is not felt. Is it because of the Moon's gravitational field that the area of zero gravity has shifted away from the center of the Earth? If this is the case, this eccentric area will orbit around the center of the Earth due to the moon's orbit.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The gravitational field is never ”felt” in free fall regardless of where you are. Whether the gravitational forces equate to zero depends on your frame of reference.

If you want to consider the Earth-Moon system, them the center of mass is indeed not at the center of the Earth.
 
The Earth and Moon orbit about the center of mass of the Earth-Moon system. This point, called the barycenter, is about 1,700 km below the Earth's surface.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Ibix, PeroK, Delta2 and 1 other person
However, it's important to stress that an object placed at the barycentre would still be attracted towards the centre of the Earth. I.e. the fact that the Earth and the Moon orbit their mutual centre of mass doesn't affect where the forces produced by the Earth on itself cancel out. This follows from the point Orodruin made - everything on/inside the Earth is in free fall w/r to the Moon, but not w/r to the Earth itself.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top