The group of invertible 2 by 2 matrices

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yxgao
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Matrices
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on identifying subgroups of GL(2,R), the group of invertible 2 by 2 matrices with real entries. It concludes that only the set of upper triangular matrices (U) qualifies as a subgroup, while the sets defined by determinant (I) and trace (III) do not meet subgroup criteria. Specifically, I fails closure under multiplication, and III lacks an identity element, as the identity matrix's trace is non-zero. The participant seeks clarification on subgroup properties and axioms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, particularly subgroups.
  • Familiarity with matrix operations, including multiplication and determinants.
  • Knowledge of the properties of the trace of a matrix.
  • Basic principles of linear algebra, specifically regarding invertible matrices.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of subgroups in group theory.
  • Learn about the determinant and trace of matrices in linear algebra.
  • Explore the axioms of a group and their implications for subgroup formation.
  • Investigate examples of other groups, such as GL(n,R), and their subgroups.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying abstract algebra and linear algebra, as well as anyone interested in the properties of matrix groups and their substructures.

yxgao
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
This is my third day studying number theory and abstract algebra, and I'm confused about the concept of subgroups.

Which one or more of the following are subgroups of GL(2,R), the group of invertible 2 by 2 matrices with real entries under matrix multiplication?

I. T = {All A in GL(2,R) for which det A = 2}
II. U = {All A in GL(2,R) for which A is upper triangular.}
III. V = {All A in GL(2,R) for which trace(A) = 0}

The answer is II only.

My textbook has an explanation, but does not go into too much detail.

What are ALL the reasons for which the I. and III. are wrong and II. is correct? E.g., which subgroups are closed under multiplication, have the identity, and have an inverse?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, it doesn't make much sense to ask about inverses when there is no identity.

That said, if you look at I, you will discover that I is not closed over multiplication.

For III, you can see that the trace of the identity matrix is non-zero, so there is no identity, even if the set is closed under multiplication.
 
What determinant and trace does the unit matrix in GL(2,R) have?

What are the axioms for a group?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
959
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K