The height at which the gravity acceleration is 5x smaller

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the height at which gravitational acceleration is one-fifth of its value at the Earth's surface, using known constants for gravity, Earth's radius, and the gravitational constant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of gravitational acceleration at a height and explore different algebraic approaches to derive the height. There are attempts to simplify the problem using ratios and cancellation of terms.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering suggestions for algebraic manipulation and exploring different methods. Some have expressed confusion over their calculations, while others have provided guidance on how to approach the problem symbolically.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the algebraic steps and the interpretation of the gravitational relationship. Some participants mention specific values and conversions that may not align with the expected results, highlighting potential misunderstandings in the setup of the problem.

Amar
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem states to calculate the height at which the gravity acceleration is 5x smaller than on the surface of the earth. So
g=9,81 m/s^2
R=6370km
M=6x10^24
gamma(don't know how to put it :P)=6,67x10^-11

Homework Equations


g=gamma x M/(R+h)^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I was pretty confident in this h = sqrt (g x R)/(gamma x M) but the result turned out bad.

The book I use states that the result is 7874 km. [/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.

Your approach sounds right. Can you show the steps in your calculations so we can look for errors?
 
Thank you :)

Firstly I calculated the 5x smaller gravity ( g/5 ) which resulted in 1,962 m/s^2
Then I converted the 6370km to meters ( 6 370 000 m )
Then, using my approach sqrt( 1,962 x 6370000 ) / ( 6,67 x 10^-11 x 6x10^24 ) i ended up with sqrt 18383940 / 40,02 x 10^23 which ended up as sqrt 0.0000000459368816 and I found it useless to continue as the result is obviously wrong
 
Feel free to write G for the gravitational constant.

You might find it simpler to first find the radial distance where the acceleration is 1/5 g. Then subtract one Earth radius to yield the height. Work with symbols at first: stuff will cancel out and you can save fingers and calculator batteries. Use ratios!
 
g_1=gamma x M/(R+0)^2
g_2 = gamma x M/(R+h)^2
g_1/g_2 = 5.
Lots of stuff should cancel out.
 
Amar said:
Firstly I calculated the 5x smaller gravity ( g/5 ) which resulted in 1,962 m/s^2
Then I converted the 6370km to meters ( 6 370 000 m )
Then, using my approach sqrt( 1,962 x 6370000 ) / ( 6,67 x 10^-11 x 6x10^24 ) i ended up with sqrt 18383940 / 40,02 x 10^23 which ended up as sqrt 0.0000000459368816 and I found it useless to continue as the result is obviously wrong
You seem to have this upside-down, or something.
 
Amar said:
g=gamma x M/(R+h)^2
Right.
Amar said:
h = sqrt (g x R)/(gamma x M)
Wrong. Have another go at that algebra. If you get the same wrong result, please post all your steps.
 
haruspex said:
Right.

Wrong. Have another go at that algebra. If you get the same wrong result, please post all your steps.
After a rather long period of trying different variations I figured it out. It resulted in h = [ sqrt (G x M) / g ] - R
NascentOxygen said:
You seem to have this upside-down, or something.

This really helped out since it was kinda upside-down...

So thank you everyone for leading me to the right solution ( and I'm really grateful for not getting a straight answer because I feel I've improved my algebra lots ).

One more question : RUber and gneill mentioned the method of canceling out, I did try that but I got R^2=(R-h)^2 and I was stuck there. I'm pretty sure I messed up somewhere in the process but could you guys explain this one to me since I want to understand this method too ( mainly because it sounds easier ).

Once again thank you very much ! :D
 
Amar said:
RUber and gneill mentioned the method of canceling out, I did try that but I got R^2=(R-h)^2 and I was stuck there.
You should have gotten that 5 R^2 = (R+h)^2, since you are looking for the gravity to be 1/5 of what it is on earth.

RUber said:
g_1=gamma x M/(R+0)^2
g_2 = gamma x M/(R+h)^2
g_1/g_2 = 5.
Lots of stuff should cancel out.
##g_1/g_2 =\frac{ \frac{ \gamma M }{R^2}}{\frac{ \gamma M }{(R+h)^2}}=\frac{(R+h)^2}{R^2}=5##
This will give you a quadratic equation in h to solve.
 
  • #10
RUber said:
You should have gotten that 5 R^2 = (R+h)^2, since you are looking for the gravity to be 1/5 of what it is on earth.##g_1/g_2 =\frac{ \frac{ \gamma M }{R^2}}{\frac{ \gamma M }{(R+h)^2}}=\frac{(R+h)^2}{R^2}=5##
This will give you a quadratic equation in h to solve.

Ahh I see now. I forgot about the 5 and didn't quite understand that concept. Thank you very much :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
19K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K