Insights The History and Importance of the Riemann Hypothesis

Click For Summary
The Riemann Hypothesis, introduced by Bernhard Riemann in 1859, posits that all non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function lie on the critical line, a concept crucial to number theory. Its historical roots trace back to early mentions of prime numbers, with significant developments occurring from Euclid's Elements in the 3rd century BC to Hilbert's problems in 1900. The Extended Riemann Hypothesis (ERH) extends this idea to L-functions, impacting modern cryptography, particularly the RSA encryption algorithm, which relies on the complexity of prime factorization. The relationship between prime numbers and the Riemann Hypothesis highlights the evolution of prime number theory, especially from the 19th century onward. Understanding this hypothesis remains vital for advancements in both mathematics and computer science.
fresh_42
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
2024 Award
Messages
20,802
Reaction score
28,394
The Riemann Hypothesis is one of the most famous and long-standing unsolved problems in mathematics, specifically in the field of number theory. It's named after the German mathematician Bernhard Riemann, who introduced the hypothesis in 1859.

  • RH: All non-trivial zeros of the Riemannian zeta function lie on the critical line.
  • ERH: All zeros of L-functions to complex Dirichlet characters of finite cyclic groups within the critical strip lie on the critical line.
  • Related Article: The Extended Riemann Hypothesis and Ramanujan’s Sum
The history of the Riemann hypothesis may be considered to start with the first mention of prime numbers in the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus around 1550 BC. It certainly began with the first treatise of prime numbers in Euclid's Elements in the 3rd century BC. It came to a - hopefully temporary - end on the 8th of August 1900 on the list of Hilbert's famous problems. And primes are the reason why we are more than ever interested in the question of whether ERH holds or not. E.g. the RSA encryption algorithm (Rivest-Shamir-Adleman, 1977) relies on the complexity of the factorization problem FP, that it is NP-hard. FP is probably neither NP-complete nor in P but we do not know for sure. Early factorization algorithms that ran in a reasonable time had to assume the extended Riemann hypothesis (Lenstra, 1988, [1]). So what do prime numbers have in common with the Riemann hypothesis which is about a function defined as a Dirichlet series?
$$
\zeta(s)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty \dfrac{1}{n^s}
$$
One has to admit that what we call prime number theory today originated in the 19th century when Dirichlet began in 1837 to apply analysis to number theory. There is a large gap between Euclid and Euler who published a new proof for the infinite number of primes in 1737.

Continue reading ...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Steve4Physics, yucheng, Janosh89 and 6 others
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K