The invention of a Newton, how was it measured back then?

  • Thread starter Thread starter christian0710
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Invention Newton
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the definition of a Newton as the force required to accelerate one kilogram at one meter per second squared. Participants express curiosity about the tools Newton used for measuring mass and acceleration, noting that he did not define the unit named after him. The conversation clarifies that the weight of an object on Earth is indeed the force exerted by the gravitational field on that mass, with a specific example given for a 10 kg mass resulting in a weight of 98 Newtons. It is emphasized that both the mass and the Earth exert equal forces on each other, in accordance with Newton's third law. The thread highlights the distinction between mass and weight, as well as the historical context of the Newton unit's definition.
christian0710
Messages
407
Reaction score
8
Hi, so I learned the definition of a Newton which is

Definition of Newton
- 1 Newton is the force needed to accelerate 1 kilogram of mass at the rate of 1 metre per second squared.
- 1N = kg*(m/s^2)

But I'm very curious about one thing
What tools did he use, and how could Newton actually measure the mass multiplied by the acceleration of an object precisely?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newton did not define the unit named after him. It wasn't named until over 200 years after his death.
 
  • Like
Likes christian0710
christian0710 said:
What tools did he use, and how could Newton actually measure the mass multiplied by the acceleration of an object precisely?
Newton was not involved in the definition. The definition was needed in order to separate mass (which is independent of location) and weight (which is dependent on location).
 
  • Like
Likes christian0710
Svein said:
Newton was not involved in the definition. The definition was needed in order to separate mass (which is independent of location) and weight (which is dependent on location).

Thank you very much - both of you. A questions comes to mind as you mention this

is it correctly understood that the weight of an object on Earth is the force that the gravitational field exerts on that mass? So if the mass is 10kg then it's weight is 10kg*9,8N = 98Newton? (do you say the gravitational field exerts 9,8N force on a mass, or that the gravitational field makes the mass exert a force of 98Newton?)
 
christian0710 said:
Thank you very much - both of you. A questions comes to mind as you mention this

is it correctly understood that the weight of an object on Earth is the force that the gravitational field exerts on that mass? So if the mass is 10kg then it's weight is 10kg*9,8N = 98Newton? (do you say the gravitational field exerts 9,8N force on a mass, or that the gravitational field makes the mass exert a force of 98Newton?)
Both the statements are true - the mass exerts a 98N force on Earth, and the Earth exerts a 98N force on the mass (Newton's 3rd law). It's just that Earth has so much mass that we don't see it move much at all (Newton's second law).
 
  • Like
Likes christian0710
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top