The invers of fixed Levi-Civita symbol's element

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the inverse of the Levi-Civita symbol's element, specifically \(\epsilon^{tabc}\). Participants clarify that the inverse should satisfy the equation involving the Kronecker delta, indicating a relationship between the indices. There is confusion about the context of the problem, with a request for more information on whether it was assigned or self-generated. The conversation also touches on simplifying the expression for \(T^a\) in terms of \(P_{a'}\) and the Levi-Civita symbol, leading to a suggestion to focus on a 3-index version of the symbol. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for clarity in the problem statement to provide accurate assistance.
merhalag
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi every one, I am really confused on how to calculate the inverse of this Levi Civita symbole's element \epsilon^{tabc}, I tried to used this equation \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}\epsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}=\delta^{\rho}_{\alpha}\delta^{\sigma}_{\beta}-\delta^{\rho}_{\beta}\delta^{\sigma}_{\alpha}

Homework Equations



In fact I am searching \left(\epsilon^{tabc}\right)^{-1} where the indices should be lower.


The Attempt at a Solution



Based on the equation above, is it correct if I write: \epsilon_{taef}\epsilon^{tabc}=\delta^{b}_{e}\delta^{c}_{f}-\delta^{b}_{f}\delta^{c}_{e}

I recall that \mu\nu\rho\sigma... are the diffeomorfism indices on curved space-time, "t" is the temporal indice and where "a,b,c..." are the spatial ones.

I apologize for my bad english once again. I have tried to do my best to make the problem statement as clear as possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this part of a problem that was given to you?

If so, you should post the full problem so helpers can see the context.

If not, then what do you mean by the "inverse" of a 4th-rank tensor. Are you searching for a tensor (which I'll denote as ##\rho##) which satisfies:
$$ \epsilon_{abcd} \; \rho^{abce} ~=~ \delta^e_d$$?
 
strangerep said:
Is this part of a problem that was given to you?

If so, you should post the full problem so helpers can see the context.

If not, then what do you mean by the "inverse" of a 4th-rank tensor. Are you searching for a tensor (which I'll denote as ##\rho##) which satisfies:
$$ \epsilon_{abcd} \; \rho^{abce} ~=~ \delta^e_d$$?

Yes, \epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} \; \rho^{\alpha\beta\delta\lambda} ~=~3! \delta^\lambda_\sigma

Where \mu,\nu,,... are the diffeomorphism indices, once one has fixed this indices, how can I find the tensor \rho?

For exemple:

T^{a}=P_{a'}\epsilon^{tabc}\epsilon^{ta'}\:_{bc}, how can I find the expression of P_{a'} alone in fonction of T_{a} and probably the inverse of \epsilon^{tabc}...

May I made the context clear? I apologize once again for my bad english. :)
 
You didn't answer my first question, so I'll ask one more time: did someone else give you this problem to solve, or did you make it up yourself?

(I think you're still not telling me the entire question. If so, my answers might not be helpful.)

Anyway...

merhalag said:
T^{a}=P_{a'}\epsilon^{tabc}\epsilon^{ta'}\:_{bc}, how can I find the expression of P_{a'} alone in fonction of T_{a} and probably the inverse of \epsilon^{tabc}...
If I understand your opening post, "t" is a fixed index, so... can't your equation be written just in terms of the 3-index ##\epsilon## symbol, i.e.,

$$T^{a}=P_{a'}\epsilon^{0abc}\epsilon^{0a'}\:_{bc} ~~?$$
Using the earlier ##\epsilon## formula, replacing ##\sigma## and ##\beta## by 0, we get
$$\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho 0}\epsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha 0}=\delta^{\rho}_{ \alpha}\delta^{0}_{0}-\delta^{\rho}_{0}\delta^{0}_{\alpha} ~.$$Now, we need consider only ##\rho\ne 0## and ##\alpha\ne 0##, otherwise the equation degenerates to ##0=0##.
Therefore, the last term above is 0, leaving ##\delta^\rho_\alpha##.

Can you apply this to your ##T^a## equation?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K