The James Webb Space Telescope

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is scheduled to launch no earlier than December 24, 2021, following a two-day delay. The launch window extends until January 6, 2022, due to gravitational constraints related to the moon. The observatory will take approximately six months to reach its operational orbit at the second Lagrange point (L2). The first year of observations will allocate around 10,000 hours of observing time, with significant projects like the Cosmos Web and studies of the TRAPPIST-1 system receiving focused attention.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of orbital mechanics, particularly L2 trajectories
  • Familiarity with astronomical observation techniques
  • Knowledge of NASA's mission planning and proposal review processes
  • Awareness of the technological capabilities of space telescopes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the JWST's scientific goals and its first-year observation schedule
  • Learn about the significance of the L2 point in space missions
  • Explore the Cosmos Web project and its implications for understanding the early universe
  • Investigate the instrumentation and technology used in the JWST
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, space enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the advancements of space observation technology and the scientific discoveries expected from the JWST.

  • #511
Arjan82 said:
Aren't repair missions out of the question with regards to its location?
Manned missions are out. There has been mention of an unmanned refueling mission (which would be difficult and is not currently planned)
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arjan82, Astranut, pinball1970 and 1 other person
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #512

Latest James Webb data hints at new physics in Universe’s expansion

This latest study serves as a critical cross-check to the April paper, using three different measurements to determine distances to galaxies known to be hosts to supernovae. "Cross-checking Hubble might sound prosaic, but the Hubble results demonstrate a profound tension in the Universe between how fast it is expanding now (measured by Hubble) versus the prediction from the standard model, LambdaCDM (calibrated by the Cosmic Microwave Background)," lead author Adam Riess, of the Space Science Telescope Institute at Johns Hopkins University, told Ars. "So Webb confirming Hubble means we are really seeing something amiss in the Universe."
1733769477758.jpeg

(And still a nice image, even if this JWST news is not as such about beautiful image details)
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and phinds
  • #514
AlexB23 said:
Yeah, but the government may fund the telescope for longer if it remains so popular.
It will get funding as long as the telescope can take data. Essentially every spacecraft does, because operating them is much cheaper than building them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: D H, AlexB23 and pinball1970
  • #515
AlexB23 said:
Yeah, but the government may fund the telescope for longer if it remains so popular.

The original mission was about 5-10 years but....

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) was designed for a mission of at least five years, with a goal of 10 years. However, after the successful launch and commissioning of the telescope, the Webb team determined that the observatory should have enough propellant to support science operations in orbit for more than 20 years.

EDIT: "An L2 orbit is unstable, so JWST needs to use propellant to maintain its halo orbit around L2 (known as station-keeping) to prevent the telescope from drifting away from its orbital position.[189] It was designed to carry enough propellant for 10 years,[190] but the precision of the Ariane 5 launch and the first midcourse correction were credited with saving enough onboard fuel that JWST may be able to maintain its orbit for around 20 years instead.[191][192][193] Space.com called the launch "flawless".[194]"

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Webb_Space_Telescope

which referenced.

https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2021/12...l-likely-to-extend-its-lifetime-expectations/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Astranut, AlexB23 and collinsmark
  • #516
mfb said:
It will get funding as long as the telescope can take data. Essentially every spacecraft does, because operating them is much cheaper than building them.

Well, let's hope that remains the case. Chandra X-ray telescope had a pretty close call of being decommissioned due to funding, even though it was quite operational.

chandra_hero-1200x675.jpg


"Scientists breathed a collective sigh of relief last week when NASA announced that the Chandra X-ray Observatory had been spared the chopping block — at least for another year. It was an abrupt about-face from plans announced in March to decommission the space-based telescope by this December.​
"Much of the credit for the 11th-hour stay of execution goes to a grassroots movement that dramatically demonstrated how public opinion can impact science funding. After receiving word last spring that Chandra was slated for termination, scientists and the public erupted in protest. Organized in part under the banner and hashtag of #SaveChandra, letters, petitions, and phone calls poured into Congress."​
Source: https://www.astronomy.com/science/c...acing-chopping-block-gets-reprieve-from-nasa/
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #517
mfb said:
It will get funding as long as the telescope can take data. Essentially every spacecraft does, because operating them is much cheaper than building them.
Agreed. No wonder why Voyager 1 and 2 are both running in 2024. :) I hope those probes run until 2030.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #518
pinball1970 said:
The original mission was about 5-10 years but....

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) was designed for a mission of at least five years, with a goal of 10 years. However, after the successful launch and commissioning of the telescope, the Webb team determined that the observatory should have enough propellant to support science operations in orbit for more than 20 years.

EDIT: "An L2 orbit is unstable, so JWST needs to use propellant to maintain its halo orbit around L2 (known as station-keeping) to prevent the telescope from drifting away from its orbital position.[189] It was designed to carry enough propellant for 10 years,[190] but the precision of the Ariane 5 launch and the first midcourse correction were credited with saving enough onboard fuel that JWST may be able to maintain its orbit for around 20 years instead.[191][192][193] Space.com called the launch "flawless".[194]"

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Webb_Space_Telescope

which referenced.

https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2021/12...l-likely-to-extend-its-lifetime-expectations/
I am glad that the JWST has the capability of running for 20 years. That means the telescope could last well until the 2030s, or even 2041.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #519
From Wiki “NGC 602 is a young, bright open cluster of stars located in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), a satellite galaxy to the Milky Way.

Radiation and shock waves from the stars of NGC 602 have pushed away much of the lighter surrounding gas and dust that is N90,

this in turn has triggered new star formation in the ridges”

There some Chandra images https://phys.org/news/2024-12-nasa-missions-cosmic-wreath-displaying.html

This one from Webb.
1734534398497.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astranut, collinsmark, Filip Larsen and 4 others
  • #522
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn, nsaspook, collinsmark and 4 others
  • #523
Another fantastic treat from JWST:
1744739130601.png

NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope has taken the most detailed image of planetary nebula NGC 1514 to date thanks to its unique mid-infrared observations. Webb shows its rings as intricate clumps of dust. It’s also easier to see holes punched through the bright pink central region.
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/with-nasas-webb-dying-stars-energetic-display-comes-into-full-focus/
https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/...-james-webb-space-telescope-worth-10-billion/
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: davenn, nsaspook, AlexB23 and 4 others
  • #525
AlexB23 said:
That nebula looks like a hamburger or a yo-yo. Beautiful stuff.
I was thinking an apple cut in half with the seeds in the middle. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and phinds
  • #526
DAH said:
I was thinking an apple cut in half with the seeds in the middle. :smile:
Yeah, it looks like that as well. Interstellar Rorschach test.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DAH
  • #528
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc, russ_watters, collinsmark and 6 others
  • #529
DennisN said:
More recent about 55 Cancri:

Renyu Hu, et. al. "A secondary atmosphere on the rocky Exoplanet 55 Cancrie", 8 May 2024 (Nature)



Abstract:

Characterizing rocky exoplanets is a central endeavor of astronomy, and yet the search for atmospheres on rocky exoplanets has hitherto resulted in either tight upper limits on the atmospheric mass 1–3 or inconclusive results 4–6. The 1.95-REarth and 8.8-MEarth planet 55 Cnc e, with a predominantly rocky composition and an equilibrium temperature of ~2000 K, may have a volatile envelope (containing molecules made from a combination of C, H, O, N, S, and P elements) that accounts for up to a few percent of its radius 7–13. The planet has been observed extensively with transmission spectroscopy 14–22, and its thermal emission has been measured in broad photometric bands 23–26. These observations disfavor a primordial H2/He-dominated atmosphere but cannot conclusively determine whether the planet has a secondary atmosphere27,28. Here we report a thermal emission spectrum of the planet obtained by JWST’s NIRCam and MIRI instruments from 4 to 12 μm. The measurements rule out the scenario where the planet is a lava world shrouded by a tenuous atmosphere made of vaporized rock29–32, and indicate a bona fide volatile atmosphere likely rich in CO2 or CO. This atmosphere can be outgassed from and sustained by a magma ocean.




So, maybe lots of soda cans opened there, or lots of combustion engines? Or both? :smile:
Seriously, I think it's fascinating.

Edit: The planet in question is 55 Cancri e.

Edit 2:

And an article:

Webb discovers evidence of an atmosphere around a rocky super-Earth planet orbiting a Sun-like star
(BBC Sky At Night Magazine, by Iain Todd, May 8, 2024)

Analyzing exoplanetary atmospheres is a really exciting field. One I haven't really dug into with any diligence. (Within the rather tight limitation of my abilities that is.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #531
The bullet cluster is an important structure when it comes to Dark matter.

From wiki

“Composite image showing the galaxy cluster 1E 0657-56, better known as bullet cluster.
The image in background showing the visible spectrum of light stems from Magellan and Hubble Space Telescope images.
The pink overlay shows the x-ray emission (recorded by Chandra Telescope) of the colliding clusters,
the blue one represents the mass distribution of the clusters calculated from gravitational lens effects.”

CHANDRA 2006 (x ray)

1751381287211.webp


JWST and Chandra below
Chandra contribution in pink/purple
A lot more what look like lensed objects in the larger circle.

1751381959431.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, Astranut and berkeman
  • #532
Cigar Galaxy (M82) Image of the Month from Webb. (MIRI)

1751892824012.webp


Some back ground information https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_82

Some other images are in the link from Hubble, Spitzer, Chandra and another from Webb (NIRCam)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astranut, collinsmark and Filip Larsen
  • #533
Three years of the JWST this week. Happy first light day Webb!

The image below is located in the Milky way, so pretty much next door w r.t. Webb's capability, Cat's Paw Nebula (NGC 6334) 4000 light years away.

Screenshot_2025-07-11-07-11-48-091~2.webp


Or if you prefer to zoom in.

 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, collinsmark, Filip Larsen and 2 others
  • #537
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and BillTre
  • #538
renormalize said:
Looks like the younger version of the star child from 2001!
1763654321572.webp


I see what you are saying!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Filip Larsen and BillTre
  • #539
Mid-infrared data from NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope (in white, grey, and red) and X-ray data from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory (in blue) come together in this photo of colliding spiral galaxies, NGC 2207 and IC 2163.

Some background here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NGC_2207_and_IC_2163

1767360334778.webp


Hubble Space Telescope image for comparison below from 2009.

1767360381234.webp
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Filip Larsen

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
933
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K