MHB The Limited Logarithm: Why x Can't Be <= 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter roni1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the limitations of logarithmic functions, specifically why the base x cannot be less than or equal to zero. It explains that the equation P = log_x(Q) translates to Q = x^P, raising concerns about defining expressions like x^{-1} or x^{1/2} when x is zero or negative. To avoid complications and the need for special definitions in these cases, logarithms are restricted to positive bases. This ensures consistency and clarity in mathematical definitions. Consequently, logarithmic functions are only defined for positive bases to maintain their validity.
roni1
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Why x can't be less or equal to zero?
 

Attachments

  • inequality.png
    inequality.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 97
Mathematics news on Phys.org
roni said:
Why x can't be less or equal to zero?
P= log_x(Q) is equivalent to Q= x^P. How, exactly, would you define x^{-1} if x were equal to 0? How would you define x^{1/2} if x were -1? In order that we not have to give special definitions to cases like those, we only define the exponential for positive base. And from that, logarithm can only be defined for positive base.
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Understanding exponentiation and logarithms together
Replies
12
Views
2K
B Why is pH a negative logarithm?
Replies
5
Views
4K
B Issue With Algebra of Logarithms
Replies
8
Views
1K
I Why is b>1 and x,y positive in logarithm definition?
Replies
6
Views
2K
MHB Logarithmic Equation solve log_(3x)3+log_(x/3)3=5/12
Replies
1
Views
1K
B Logarithmic Function: Can Domain of Logarithm be R?
Replies
11
Views
1K
MHB Solving for an exponential equation using logarithms 16^{x}-5(4)^{x}-6=0
Replies
3
Views
2K
Why you can’t take the logarithm of a negative number or of 0 ?
Replies
7
Views
19K
I Ln x as a logarithmic function
Replies
17
Views
2K
B How come this natural logarithm approximation works?
Replies
14
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top