MHB The Limited Logarithm: Why x Can't Be <= 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter roni1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the limitations of logarithmic functions, specifically why the base x cannot be less than or equal to zero. It explains that the equation P = log_x(Q) translates to Q = x^P, raising concerns about defining expressions like x^{-1} or x^{1/2} when x is zero or negative. To avoid complications and the need for special definitions in these cases, logarithms are restricted to positive bases. This ensures consistency and clarity in mathematical definitions. Consequently, logarithmic functions are only defined for positive bases to maintain their validity.
roni1
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Why x can't be less or equal to zero?
 

Attachments

  • inequality.png
    inequality.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 98
Mathematics news on Phys.org
roni said:
Why x can't be less or equal to zero?
P= log_x(Q) is equivalent to Q= x^P. How, exactly, would you define x^{-1} if x were equal to 0? How would you define x^{1/2} if x were -1? In order that we not have to give special definitions to cases like those, we only define the exponential for positive base. And from that, logarithm can only be defined for positive base.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

Similar threads

Back
Top