The mass of the sun at its beginning

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mass of the Sun approximately 4.5 billion years ago and its projected mass 6.5 billion years into the future, particularly during the white dwarf stage. Current estimates indicate that the Sun has lost about 0.7% of its mass over its lifetime, primarily due to solar winds, which account for roughly 0.01% of its mass loss thus far. As the Sun transitions into the Red Giant phase, it is expected to lose about 50% of its mass, resulting in a planetary nebula and a carbon/oxygen white dwarf. The mass-luminosity relationship is applicable only during the Sun's main-sequence phase and does not provide a reliable method for calculating mass throughout its entire lifecycle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stellar evolution and lifecycle stages
  • Familiarity with solar physics and mass loss mechanisms
  • Knowledge of the mass-luminosity relationship in main-sequence stars
  • Basic grasp of exponential decay functions in astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mass-luminosity relationship for main-sequence stars
  • Study the processes of solar wind and its impact on stellar mass
  • Examine the stages of stellar evolution leading to white dwarf formation
  • Explore mathematical models for calculating mass loss in stars over time
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students studying stellar evolution, as well as anyone interested in the long-term changes in solar mass and its implications for the future of the Sun.

elegysix
Messages
404
Reaction score
15
Hi guys, so I know the sun is losing mass because it is radiating energy away. This leads me to wonder about some things - I have been trying to figure out what the mass of the sun was ~4.5 billion years ago (current age of the sun).
Also I am interested in knowing what the mass will be ~6.5 billion years from now, when it is entering the white dwarf stage.

Does anyone know it? Or know how to figure it out? I am assuming it involves an exponential decay function, because of the familiar relationship between luminosity and mass.

Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Well, back of the envelope, the mass loss will be at most 0.7% over the entire age of the sun. So the curve probably won't be very interesting if you just take into account mass loss due to E=mc2. :)

(This is assuming that the sun starts off at 100% H and turns into 100%He at the end of it's life via the pp chain. Not at all true, it's an upper-ish bound.)

Most mass loss by the sun is done by the solar winds, which amounts to ~0.01% over the life of the sun so far, or 7 billion tonnes an hour. When the sun enters the Red Giant phase, the mass loss will get a bit more ... explosive.
 
The only time the Sun loses a significant amount of mass is most likely after it is finished burning H into He. Then, in late stages of evolution, it is believed it will lose roughly 50% of its mass and create what is called a "planetary nebula", and the other half will stay behind as a carbon/oxygen white dwarf. There is some chance the Sun had a much stronger stellar wind when it was very young, but it's hard to imagine that it could have sustained a strong wind long enough to affect its mass significantly. As you have heard, the mass lost to H fusion is pretty negligible.
 
elegysix said:
Does anyone know it? Or know how to figure it out? I am assuming it involves an exponential decay function, because of the familiar relationship between luminosity and mass.

It looks like you misunderstood something here: the mass-luminosity relationship only holds for stars on the main-sequence (i.e.. the sun as it is today). It does not enable you to relate the mass to the luminosity throughout the star's life (even if you knew one of the two).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
493