The meaning of the relative strength of forces

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the relative strength of forces, particularly focusing on gravity and the weak nuclear force, as well as the electric force. Participants explore the implications of comparing these forces and the challenges in making such comparisons due to differing properties like mass and charge.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the meaning of describing gravity as a "weak force" and its comparison to the weak nuclear force, suggesting that such statements imply a relationship between mass and charge.
  • One participant provides mathematical expressions for gravitational and electric forces, noting that the proportionality constants indicate a significant difference in strength, with k being approximately 10^20 times G.
  • Another participant challenges the validity of comparing forces based on mass and charge, arguing that the different units make direct comparisons problematic and introduce a conversion factor.
  • A later reply acknowledges the complexity of the situation and suggests that the discussion may relate to the relative coupling constants of the four fundamental forces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of comparing the strengths of forces based on mass and charge, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in comparing forces due to differences in units and the complexity of the underlying physics, particularly regarding coupling constants.

Tac-Tics
Messages
816
Reaction score
7
It's common to hear people say that gravity is a "weak force" and that it is "32 times weaker than the weak nuclear force." But what does that even mean, if it has any meaning at all. The gravity on a particle is proportional to its mass. The electric force on an object is proportional to its charge. To make a statement about relative strengths, that would mean you're making an implicit statement about the relationship between an object's charge and mass, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a simple illustration using simplifed forms of the gravitational and electric forces:

[tex]F_{g}=G\frac{m_{1}m_{2}}{r^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]F_{e}=k\frac{q_{1}q_{2}}{r^{2}}[/tex]

If we compare the constants of proportionality, k and G, we find that k=10^20 G. It's basically saying that per whatever unit the force uses to measure its strength, one force is much stronger than another.
 
Nabeshin said:
Here's a simple illustration using simplifed forms of the gravitational and electric forces:

[tex]F_{g}=G\frac{m_{1}m_{2}}{r^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]F_{e}=k\frac{q_{1}q_{2}}{r^{2}}[/tex]

If we compare the constants of proportionality, k and G, we find that k=10^20 G. It's basically saying that per whatever unit the force uses to measure its strength, one force is much stronger than another.

Yeah, but that's comparing apples (mass) to oranges (charge). The units are different, so you can't simply divide and find the ratio of the strengths... you're left with a conversion factor of kg/C or something.
 
You are of course right. That example was pretty terrible and I was making light of what is a much more complicated situation. I don't fully understand this myself but after looking around I think it has something to do with the relative coupling constants for the four fundamental forces.

See:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coupling_constant
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
699
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
5K