Undergrad Finding Most General Form of Rindler Coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of Rindler coordinates as presented on Wikipedia, specifically addressing the relationship defined by the equation X² - T² = 1/a². The participants clarify that the correct expression for the variable φ should be φ = at, where t represents the proper time along the worldline of a Rindler-stationary observer. This correction is crucial for accurately understanding the transformation into Rindler coordinates. The conversation concludes with one participant confirming their understanding after receiving guidance on the proper time calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Rindler coordinates
  • Familiarity with hyperbolic functions (cosh and sinh)
  • Knowledge of proper time in relativistic physics
  • Basic grasp of coordinate transformations in general relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Rindler coordinates in detail
  • Explore the implications of proper time in relativistic frameworks
  • Learn about hyperbolic functions and their applications in physics
  • Investigate coordinate transformations in general relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of general relativity, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of Rindler coordinates and their applications in understanding accelerated frames of reference.

kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
I'm searching, but so far I have not found a derivation of the coordinates shown by wikipedia in the very beginning of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rindler_coordinates#Characteristics_of_the_Rindler_frame.

It seems obvious from the relation ##X^2 - T^2 = 1 / a^2##, (##c = 1##), that ##X = (1/a) \cosh \varphi## and ##Y = (1/a) \sinh \varphi##, but that ##\varphi = t/a## is not obvious.

Sorry, I've titled this thread as "the most general form" but later realized that the form I'm talking about is not the most general form. Anyways the question remains.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kent davidge said:
that ##\varphi = t/a## is not obvious.

It shouldn't be, since it's wrong. As you've defined ##\varphi##, it should be ##\varphi = a t##, where ##t## is the proper time along the worldline.
 
PeterDonis said:
It shouldn't be, since it's wrong. As you've defined ##\varphi##, it should be ##\varphi = a t##, where ##t## is the proper time along the worldline.
Yes, I typed it wrong.
 
Did you try computing the proper time along the worldline of a Rindler-stationary observer? If so, what did you get?
 
  • Like
Likes kent davidge
Orodruin said:
Did you try computing the proper time along the worldline of a Rindler-stationary observer? If so, what did you get?
Thanks. Got it after your hint.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K