The Mystery of Equation (3.1.3) and the Origin of the Universe

bobsan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
How can we know that the initial mass of the universe was half of the Planck mass from the formula mass density of the Universe as a function of universal time?
Relevant Equations
(ρ reduced)(Tp)^2 = ρT^2
ρ reduced = 3c^5/(4hG^2)
Screen Shot 2022-05-23 at 14.07.18.png

I tried setting the Universal time T = Tp as when T = 0 there was no universe and thought Tp would be the first instance of the universe, but I still can't figure out how equation (3.1.3) implies that M0 = Mp/2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
bobsan said:
Homework Statement:: How can we know that the initial mass of the universe was half of the Planck mass from the formula mass density of the Universe as a function of universal time?
Relevant Equations:: (ρ reduced)(Tp)^2 = ρT^2
ρ reduced = 3c^5/(4hG^2)

View attachment 301814
I tried setting the Universal time T = Tp as when T = 0 there was no universe and thought Tp would be the first instance of the universe, but I still can't figure out how equation (3.1.3) implies that M0 = Mp/2
Hi @bobsan. Welcome to PF.

The reasoning in the attachment isn’t clear (well, it's missing actually). Not a familiar area for me but you could try this...

Consider the initial volume to be a sphere with diameter (or possibly radius) equal to the Planck length. Express this volume in terms of ℏ, G and c.

Multiply this by the density as given in equation 3.1.4. This gives you an expression for the initial mass. Compare this expression to the standard formula (expressed in in terms of ℏ, G and c)for the Planck mass.

If you’re lucky, you may find your expression for mass is half the Planck mass. No idea if that’s what’s intended though.
 
Where are you getting this from?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top