The Mystery of Inherent Radiation in Plants: A Search for Answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Odeon2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plants Radiation
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the search for research regarding inherent radiation in plants and concerns about the safety of consuming such plants. Participants highlight that background radiation is a natural occurrence, primarily from isotopes like Potassium-40, Uranium, and Thorium, with negligible amounts from Carbon-14. There is a consensus that avoiding radiation entirely is impractical, as all food contains some level of natural radioactivity. The conversation also touches on the risks of heavy metals in food, such as arsenic in rice, and emphasizes the importance of relying on regulatory bodies like the FDA for safety information. Overall, the dialogue underscores the complexity of food safety regarding both radiation and toxic substances.
  • #31
Carbon isotopes are used in carbon dating, which depends on measuring carbon isotope ratios that differ from what occurs in the atmosphere. All fixed carbon comes from photosynthesis ultimately.

Fractionation of carbon isotopes in oxygenic photosynthesis is the driver. Lighter isotopes are fixed into sugars.

So yes, isotopes of carbon would meet your requirement.
See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractionation_of_carbon_isotopes_in_oxygenic_photosynthesis
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Keith_McClary and hmmm27
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #32
gleem said:
A 70 kg human has on average 116,200 pCi of K40 in their bodies at all times and always will unless you can obtain isotopically pure K39 to replace it with.
As I recall there was some early studies about the natural radioactivity of K40 being the electrical 'starter' of heartbeats, but I'm not sure how far could they go with the research.
 
  • #33
Thanks Keith ! I am very interested in this. I wonder if people know that butter beans have more radiation than bananas. It was also interesting to note that water made the top ten! And I thought beer was healthy :)

But in reality, since the International Atomic Energy Agency states (https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/new...s-discuss-harmonizing-international-standards) that :

"All foods contain natural radionuclides, which are transferred from the soil to the crops on land and from water to fish in rivers, lakes and the sea. Levels of natural radionuclides in food and drinking water are generally very low and safe for human consumption. However, they can vary considerably depending on local geology, climate and agricultural practices. " THERE IS NO REAL STANDARD, thus the reason for this conference.

Note that "... Lieve Sweeck from the Belgian nuclear research centre SCK•CEN noted, assessing the movement and accumulation of natural radionuclides in the environment and in the food chain is important because the largest part of most people’s radiation dose comes from natural sources. "

I am interested in the extraction of radiation, validated via Carbon 14 dating, from plants. I am confident that a simple process for performing the extraction will be published soon.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K