The Mystery of The Stove Top Heating Element

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences in resistance between electric stove heating elements, specifically a small element measuring ~45 Ohms and a longer element at ~26 Ohms. Participants concluded that the resistance is influenced by the wire's gauge and length, with thinner wire yielding higher resistance per unit length. The power generated by these elements is determined by the formula P = V²/R, where V is constant, indicating that lower resistance results in higher heat output. The design of heating elements is optimized for temperature efficiency, balancing resistance and heat generation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrical resistance and Ohm's Law
  • Familiarity with heating element construction and materials, particularly nichrome wire
  • Knowledge of power calculations in electrical circuits
  • Basic concepts of thermal dynamics related to heating elements
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of nichrome wire and its applications in heating elements
  • Study the principles of electrical resistance and its impact on heating efficiency
  • Explore the design considerations for electric stove heating elements
  • Learn about safety standards and practices for electric heating appliances
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, appliance manufacturers, and anyone interested in the design and functionality of electric heating elements in stoves.

PhysiPhile
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
This has been bugging me and I just can't seem to figure out a solid answer.

My electric stove has different sized heating elements where the size comes from just a longer heating element. It looks like this:

http://www.sausagemaker.com/ProductImages/41516.jpg

When I measure the resistance of the small one I get ~45 Ohms, whereas, the longer one has ~26 Ohms.

Intuitively, you would think the longer coil would have more resistance so I'm trying to understand why this isn't the case.

My current two theories are: (1) a different concentration of doping materials are being used (which doesn't seem like a very efficient manufacturing process) or (2) the diameters are different inside the black coating (which doesn't seem right either).

Anyone know the answer or have another idea?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
My guess is the longer element is designed to have lower resistance in order to consume more power and generate more heat. I don't know if the design for both elements ends up consuming the same fixed amount of power per unit length of element.
 
rcgldr said:
My guess is the longer element is designed to have lower resistance in order to consume more power and generate more heat. I don't know if the design for both elements ends up consuming the same fixed amount of power per unit length of element.


Yeah, I was thinking along the same lines. But was wondering what really is different about the two heating elements that gives it that property (e.g. different material or different cross-sectional areas)
 
The electrical resistance is a wire coiled in a helix inside the "tube" that you can see. The higher resistance element will probably use thinner wire with a higher resistance per unit length.

The power (heat) produced = V2/R and V is fixed by the mains electricity supply, so a bigger value of R gives less heat generated.
 
The heating elements are wires wrapped in an eletrcial insulator that conducts the heat. Can you see a difference in the wire diameters? Perhaps a different compound is used in the wires. I tried a web search, but didn't have any luck finiding resistance numbers, other than they tend to range from 20 to 120 ohms.
 
AlephZero said:
The electrical resistance is a wire coiled in a helix inside the "tube" that you can see. The higher resistance element will probably use thinner wire with a higher resistance per unit length.

The power (heat) produced = V2/R and V is fixed by the mains electricity supply, so a bigger value of R gives less heat generated.

So you think it's a geometric not material difference? That would go along with my second theory.

I am really close to cutting the heating element in half haha...oh the things that get me side tracked.
 
rcgldr said:
Can you see a difference in the wire diameters?

It you can see the wires, you have a big safety problem! Remember these elements are designed so that accidentally pouring a pan full of salty water over them while they are switched on won't electrocute you.
 
rcgldr said:
Can you see a difference in the wire diameters?

AlephZero said:
It you can see the wires, you have a big safety problem.
In the image shown in the OP, you can see wires protuding from the ends of the burner element.
 
  • #10
rcgldr said:
In the image shown in the OP, you can see wires protuding from the ends of the burner element.

Oops, I didn't look that closely at the picture. The elements I'm familiar with have a watertight plug and socket connection system, not bare wires.
 
  • #11
rcgldr said:
In the image shown in the OP, you can see wires protuding from the ends of the burner element.

Those are almost certainly not the heating elements, just wires for making electrical connections. There's no reason to be producing heat there and good reasons to make the connections to the actual heating element in the factory and keep them well protected inside the tube.
 
  • #12
The length that has been chosen for the coiled up element (the big thing you can see) is probably based on the temperature that it is designed to reach. Even with a low power element, you may want it to reach red heat. I have a feeling that, if you had a long coil, it would not actually get that hot because of natural heat loss and energy balance. Hence they make the low power elements shorter so that they can still reach a high temperature and radiate their heat to the pan.
This has nothing to do with the way they achieve the actual resistance of the nichrome wire inside. This is done by choosing the gauge of wire and the length that is coiled up inside.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K