The net force and centre of gravity of a one dimensional object

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the net force and center of gravity for a one-dimensional object, specifically a uniformly distributed mass (stick) and a point mass. The user initially attempted to formulate the gravitational force using integrals but received feedback indicating inaccuracies in their equations. The correct gravitational force equation is F_G = -\frac{GmM}{l}\int_{x-l/2}^{x+l/2} \frac{dr}{r^2}, and the center of gravity should be defined as the radial distance where the force on a point mass equals that on the rod, without involving logarithmic functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational force equations
  • Knowledge of integral calculus
  • Familiarity with center of mass and center of gravity concepts
  • Basic physics principles related to forces in one-dimensional space
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of gravitational force equations in classical mechanics
  • Learn about integral calculus applications in physics
  • Research the differences between center of mass and center of gravity
  • Explore multi-dimensional force analysis for complex systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to forces and center of gravity in one-dimensional systems.

Droctagonopus
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I have been trying to derive a formula for the forces acting on and the centre of gravity of objects in a one dimensional space. I've started in one dimension to make things easier and intend to move on to two dimensions soon. I tried to do it without referring to any source and I got a solution which I want to check with experienced people.

A one dimensional stick whose mass is uniformly distributed has its centre of mass at position x on a number line. It has a mass of m and a length l. There is a point mass at x = 0 of mass M.

I used to gravitational equation inside an integral.

x+\frac{l}{2}​
F_{G} = \frac{\int Fdr}{l} = mMG\int\frac{1}{r^{2}}dr
x-\frac{l}{2}​

(Sorry about the bad placement of the limits because I don't know how to put them in the editor).

I then used this equation to find out the centre of gravity.

\frac{\int FRdr}{\int Fdr}=\frac{\int\frac{1}{r}dr}{\int\frac{1}{r^{2}}dr} with the limits of both integrals being the same as the limits for the equation for the force.

I substituted the values into the integrals and got the final equations to be these:
F_{G}=\frac{4mMG|x|}{x(l^{2}-4x^{2})}
(The \frac{|x|}{x} is there to account for the direction of the force).

x_{G}=\frac{ln(\frac{2x+l}{2x-l})(4x^{2}-l^{2})}{4l}

Are my reasoning and equations correct? It took me hours to get to this. (Actually, it took me two years because I didn't know the problem needed integrals and I didn't know what integrals were but once I realized that it might need integrals it took me hours).

Edit: I have checked them with some actual values and they do seem correct. As the stick goes further away from the point mass the centre of gravity and centre of mass of the stick converge and the force on the stick gets closer to the value of the force on a particle of the same mass at the same position. But I might still be wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, your equations are not correct.

The force integral is almost correct. It's best to use a proper sign convention indicating that force pulls the object toward the origin. You should be using F_G = -\frac{GmM}{l}\int_{x-l/2}^{x+l/2} \frac{dr}{r^2}.

The center of gravity calculation is incorrect. This is simply the radial distance at which the force on a point mass of mass m is the same as that on your rod. There is no natural logarithm in the solution.
 
Thanks. I understand the force now.

To summarise for the centre of gravity. If, instead of a rod, there existed another point mass of the same mass of the rod, the position of this point mass so that it has the same force exerted on it as on the rod is the centre of gravity of the rod. Right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K