The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2003

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the 2003 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, awarded for discoveries related to channels in cell membranes, specifically focusing on the contributions of Peter Agre and Roderick MacKinnon. Participants explore the implications of these awards, the nature of scientific recognition, and the political dynamics within the scientific community.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express admiration for the laureates and the prestige of being associated with them as students.
  • Others suggest that jealousy may arise among students due to the collaborative nature of scientific discoveries and the recognition given to a few individuals.
  • One participant argues that working with the laureates should be a source of pride rather than jealousy, emphasizing the positive impact on one's resume.
  • A later post references a controversy regarding Raymond Damadian, suggesting that political factors may influence Nobel Prize selections and that not all deserving scientists receive recognition.
  • Another participant notes the unusual circumstance of a chemist receiving the Nobel Prize in Medicine, highlighting the interdisciplinary nature of the awards.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of admiration and skepticism regarding the recognition of scientific contributions, with some agreeing on the collaborative nature of science while others highlight the competitive and political aspects. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these dynamics.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific individuals and controversies without reaching a consensus on the fairness of the Nobel Prize selections or the broader implications of scientific politics.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in the dynamics of scientific recognition, the history of the Nobel Prize, and the interplay between collaboration and competition in scientific research may find this discussion relevant.

Monique
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,215
Reaction score
61
http://www.nobel.se/chemistry/laureates/2003/index.html

"for discoveries concerning channels in cell membranes"

Peter Agre - Johns Hopkins University "for the discovery of water channels"

Roderick MacKinnon - Rockefeller University "for structural and mechanistic studies of ion channels"



This is so cool, can you imagine being one of their students?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
But I can also imagine people being jealous, since these discoveries are never made alone and usually have taken the sweet blood and tears of students.
 
I don't see why you would/should be jealous. The fact that you worked with these men alone should be enough. Plus it would look awesome on your resume
 
Well, my prediction was right, just look at https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=10687"

Originally posted by adrenaline
It took a long time because of a controversy about another scientist that probably should have also been a corecipient...Raymond Damadian He was shafted! Whoever thinks science isn't rife with politics is wrong.

http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20031008/06/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
2003 Nobel Prize in Medicine was given to a chemist
2003Nobel Prize in Chemistry was given to an M.D.


Just a bit of worthless but unusual peace of info.

Nautica
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
901
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K