Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the concept of the amount of substance, particularly in relation to hydrogen molecules and the Avogadro constant. Participants explore definitions, calculations, and interpretations of what constitutes a "discrete atomic-scale particle" in the context of moles and mass.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants reference Wikipedia's definition of the amount of substance as the number of discrete atomic-scale particles divided by the Avogadro constant.
- There is a distinction made between counting hydrogen atoms versus hydrogen molecules, with implications for the amount of substance calculated.
- One participant asserts that a single H2 molecule should be considered as having an amount of substance of 1/NA, leading to questions about the interpretation of "discrete atomic-scale particle."
- Another participant clarifies that if considering H2 as the discrete particle, then it would indeed have an amount of substance of 1/NA, but this raises further questions about definitions.
- Some participants discuss the analogy of moles to other counting units, like a dozen, to clarify the concept.
- There is a humorous comparison made regarding the mass of a mole of cows and moles of other entities, illustrating the scale of these quantities.
- One participant mentions that the BIPM uses the term "elementary entity," suggesting a broader interpretation of what can be considered in these calculations.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on what constitutes a "discrete atomic-scale particle" and how to apply the concept of amount of substance to individual molecules versus moles. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of these terms and their implications for calculations.
Contextual Notes
There are limitations in the assumptions made about the definitions of particles and entities, as well as the mathematical steps involved in the calculations. The discussion reflects varying interpretations and does not reach a consensus on these points.