The orbital eccentricity change of the Earth ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Earth's orbital eccentricity is decreasing at a rate of approximately -0.00004292 per century, indicating that the orbit is becoming more circular over time. This conclusion is supported by observations of other planets and their orbital solutions consistent with General Relativity. The analysis of these orbital motions reveals quasiperiodic oscillations in eccentricity and inclination, contributing to Milankovitch climate cycles on Earth and Mars. Key data was sourced from J. Laskar's 1988 study on the secular evolution of the Solar System.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of orbital mechanics and eccentricity
  • Familiarity with General Relativity principles
  • Knowledge of Milankovitch cycles and their implications
  • Experience with astronomical observation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research J. Laskar's "Secular evolution of the Solar System over 10 million years"
  • Explore the methods of measuring astronomical distances without radar
  • Investigate the implications of Milankovitch cycles on climate change
  • Learn about the Runge-Lenz vector and its application in orbital mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, climate scientists, and students of astrophysics interested in the dynamics of Earth's orbit and its climatic effects.

Bjarne
Messages
344
Reaction score
0
Can someone answer one, some or all these questions;
  • Is the orbit of the Earth right now getting more circular or more elliptical?
  • How much?
  • How can we be sure?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The eccentricity of the Earth's orbit is decreasing at a rate of ~-0.00004292/century.
 
Bjarne said:
Can someone answer one, some or all these questions;
  • Is the orbit of the Earth right now getting more circular or more elliptical?
  • How much?
  • How can we be sure?

We can be sure based on observations and measurements coupled with predicted effects based on physics.
 
Drakkith said:
We can be sure based on observations and measurements coupled with predicted effects based on physics.

We can so far I know not measure the distance to the Sun because the Sun does not reflect radar.

So how accurate is “observation” ?
 
Very accurate, actually. The trick is not to observe the Sun directly, but to observe the other planets, and to find a self-consistent orbital solution from these observations that agrees with General Relativity. One can even test for departures from GR and for unmodeled mass.

Once one does that, one can extrapolate the planets' motions several million years both forward and backward. When one does that, one finds that the planets' orbit orientations do loop-the-loops, and that their eccentricities and inclinations oscillate quasiperiodically. This leads to Milankovitch climate cycles on the Earth and likely also on Mars.

In particular, I've plotted

Eccentricity / Runge-Lenz vector: {e*cos(w), e*sin(w)}
Inclination / north-pole vector: {sin(i)*cos(W), sin(i)*sin(W)}

for the last several million years.

I've made videos for YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/my_playlists?p=D0825FC30A2F00A6
http://www.youtube.com/my_playlists?p=86F2CCA7F3F677ED

I got the numbers from here:
J. Laskar
"Secular evolution of the Solar System over 10 million years"
Astronomy and Astrophysics, 198, 341-362 (1988).
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988A&A...198..341L

I had to OCR the numbers and then painstakingly correct the OCRing, so there might still be some typos.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bjarne said:
We can so far I know not measure the distance to the Sun because the Sun does not reflect radar.

So how accurate is “observation” ?

There are direct observations that can be made to determine the distance to the sun. We don't need to reflect radar off of it.

See here for more info. http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=400
(Further down is how the 1st astronomers measured the distance to the sun)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K