The Parabola Opening Up and Merging Roots

  • Thread starter Thread starter discombobulated
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around two quadratic equations. The first equation is f(x) = x² - kx + 16, where participants are tasked with finding the set of values for k that result in no real solutions. The second equation is kx² + (4k + 1)x + (3k + 1) = 0, which is under examination for conditions that yield a repeated root.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the discriminant to determine conditions for no real solutions and repeated roots. There are attempts to derive values for k, with some questioning the need to find x in the first problem. Others express uncertainty about the meaning of a repeated root and how it relates to the discriminant being zero.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the problems are being explored, particularly regarding the conditions for k in both equations. Some participants have provided calculations and alternative values for k, while others are seeking clarification on concepts such as repeated roots and the implications of the discriminant.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the definitions of repeated roots and the implications of the discriminant being zero. Participants are also navigating through potential errors in their calculations and interpretations of the quadratic equations.

discombobulated
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Ok this is the first question:
1) Find the set of values of k for which the equation: f(x)=x2-kx+16 has no real solutions.

This is what I've done:
discriminant < 0

k2-4(16) =0
K2-64=0
k=8

x2-8x+16
(x-4)(x-4)=0
x=4

But, i don't know what to do next now! Please help!

2) The quadratic equation kx2+(4k+1)x +(3k+1)=0 has a repeated root. find the value of k.

I'm not at all sure about this one, but i tried to do something anyway:
(4kx+x)2 -12k2+4k=0
4kx +x -10k = 0
(2k+x)(2x-5) =0

I have no idea what I'm doing, please help!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first question in part 1 should be +/- 8.

For question 2, the discriminant will be 0. Where you went wrong was including the x. The b term is the cofficient on x, not x and the coefficient and that should be -4k in the end bit of the first step.
 
Thanks, i need to be more careful! I got k= 1/10 for the second question.
And for the first question, i didn't need to work out x? But how do i get the set of values for k? Also, shouldn't it be just -8 because the discriminant is less than 0 for no real solutions?
:confused:
 
discombobulated said:
Thanks, i need to be more careful! I got k= 1/10 for the second question.
And for the first question, i didn't need to work out x? But how do i get the set of values for k? Also, shouldn't it be just -8 because the discriminant is less than 0 for no real solutions?
:confused:
As you say, D has to be < 0 so:
k²-4(16) < 0
K²-64 < 0

Now, watch out:

K² < 64
-8 < k < 8

You see?
 
OH! Thanks!
 
Are you sure it's k=1/10?

discombobulated said:
Thanks, i need to be more careful! I got k= 1/10 for the second question.
And for the first question, i didn't need to work out x? But how do i get the set of values for k? Also, shouldn't it be just -8 because the discriminant is less than 0 for no real solutions?
:confused:

I am getting a different answer.
How did you find yours?
Did you check that you get a repeated root x for k=1/10?

I might be wrong too. :blushing:
 
err, what does it mean by 'repeated root', is it like equal real roots?
 
Yes - repeated root and equal roots (not necessarily real) mean the same thing in this case.

If it's any help, I'm getting a -1/2 for k, with the multiple root at x = -1.
 
For k = 1/10, there are no real solutions, if you're referring to question 1 (since that was quoted...)

Diane_ said:
Yes - repeated root and equal roots (not necessarily real) mean the same thing in this case.

If it's any help, I'm getting a -1/2 for k, with the multiple root at x = -1.
Yes, that's correct for question 2.
 
  • #10
so it's like this:

16x2+1 -12k2-4k=0
4k+1-2k=0
2k+1=0
k=-1/2

but i don't understand the multiple root?!
 
  • #11
When the discriminant is 0, we usually say that there is "only 1 solution" (namelijk -b/a), but in fact, there are still 2 solutions, but they 'fall together', it's a 'multiple root' which can be written as (x-a)² = 0 with a the double root.
 
  • #12
Probebly am i missing something don't know what repeated mean?

x2+4x+2k+3
(x+2)2=-2k-3+4
x=2+-(-2k+1)1/2
 
  • #13
For a quadratic equation of the form ax^2+bx+c=0, the two possible solutions are given by

\frac{{ - b \pm \sqrt {b^2 - 4ac} }}{{2a}}

Now, when the discriminant, \sqrt {b^2 - 4ac}, is zero, the two solutions 'fall together", you then have a double root.
 
  • #14
Geometrically, you know that a quadratic can be graphed as a parabola, with the roots being where the graph crosses the x-axis. Imagine such a parabola opening up, crossing the axis in two places. This would be the case for a quadratic with two real roots.

Now imagine that parabola rising. As it does so, the two roots start to approach each other. When the parabola is just tangent to the axis, the two roots will have merged. This is the case where there is a single root - but it's composed of the two "merged" roots. It's a double root.

Not that it matters, but if you let the parabola continue to rise, it no longer crosses the x-axis. That would be two complex roots.

Does this help any?
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
943
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K