The period for small oscillations of a system

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a system involving springs and a mass, focusing on the period of small oscillations. Participants analyze the forces and torques acting on the system, particularly in the context of equilibrium and angular displacement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the moment about a pivot point and question the contributions of various forces, including gravity and spring tensions. There is discussion on the equilibrium conditions and the implications of the signs in the equations derived for spring compression and tension.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to derive equations for torque and angular motion, with some participants providing insights into the equilibrium conditions. There is recognition of the need to clarify assumptions regarding the behavior of the springs and the forces involved, but no consensus has been reached on the correctness of the derived equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information available for discussion. The assumptions about the springs' states in equilibrium and the effects of small displacements are under scrutiny.

zeralda21
Messages
119
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



See picture :


PD7JKjk.jpg


Homework Equations



##\sum M_{O}=I_{O}\ddot{\theta }##



The Attempt at a Solution



Consider the free-body diagram associated with an arbitrary positive angular displacement ##\theta##; The moment about point ##O## is given by

##\sum M_{O}=-k\left ( b\sin\theta \right )\left ( b\cos\theta \right )-k\left ( 2b\sin\theta \right )\left ( 2b\cos\theta \right )-\underbrace{\left ( 3mgb\sin\theta \right )\left ( 3b\cos\theta \right )}_{\mathit{Why \ shouldn't \ this \ be \ included?}}##

Further, by the parallel axis theorem, ##I_{0}=\overline{I}+md^2=0+m(3b)^2=9mb^2## and for small oscillations ##\sin\theta\simeq \theta \ \ \wedge \cos\theta\simeq 1## and ##\tau =\frac{2\pi}{\omega _{n}}=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}##. BUT why does not the mass of the sphere contribute to the moment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The springs are stretched initially to keep the rod and mass horizontal, so the torque of gravity is balanced by the torque of the tensions in the springs. You only need to take into account the additional torques if you displace the mass from the equilibrium. The torque of gravity does not change if the displacement is small as it is proportional to the cosine of the angle.

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Hello ehild

ehild said:
The springs are stretched initially to keep the rod and mass horizontal, so the torque of gravity is balanced by the torque of the tensions in the springs.

Why should both the springs be stretched in the equilibrium position ? Either the upper one should be stretched or the lower one should be compressed or may be both the conditions hold simultaneously .

Am I right ?

Let the lower spring be compressed by x1 and upper stretched by x2 in equilibrium .Then,

For translational equilibrium , kx1+kx2 = mg

For rotational equilibrium kx1b+kx2(2b) = mg(3b)

Solving the above ,we get x2 = 2mg/k and x1 = -mg/k .

What does minus sign in x1 = -mg/k signify ?
 
Tanya Sharma said:
Hello ehild



Why should both the springs be stretched in the equilibrium position ? Either the upper one should be stretched or the lower one should be compressed or may be both the conditions hold simultaneously .

Am I right ?

Let the lower spring be compressed by x1 and upper stretched by x2 in equilibrium .

By "stretched" I meant that the springs are under tension (well, not necessarily both). You do not know the relaxed lengths. And it can happen that both are really stretched.

Tanya Sharma said:
Then,

For translational equilibrium , kx1+kx2 = mg
That is not true. You ignored the force of the pivot.

Tanya Sharma said:
For rotational equilibrium kx1b+kx2(2b) = mg(3b)

That is correct.
Tanya Sharma said:
Solving the above ,we get x2 = 2mg/k and x1 = -mg/k .

What does minus sign in x1 = -mg/k signify ?
As the first equation is not valid you can not determine x1 and x2.
 
As always you are right :smile: .

Writing torque equation,

$$ M(3b)^2\ddotθ = -[k(x_1+bsinθ)(bcosθ)+k(x_2+2bsinθ)(2bcosθ) - mg(3b)] $$

Now ## kx_1(bcosθ)+kx_2(2bcosθ) ≈ mg(3b) ##

$$ 9Mb^2\ddotθ = -[k(bsinθ)(bcosθ)+k(2bsinθ)(2bcosθ)] $$

Applying approximations ,

$$ 9Mb^2\ddotθ = -[k(bsinθ)(bcosθ)+k(2bsinθ)(2bcosθ)] $$

$$ 9Mb^2\ddotθ = -5kb^2θ$$

$$ \ddotθ = -\frac{5k}{9M}θ$$

$$ \omega = \sqrt{\frac{5k}{9M}}$$

$$ T = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{9M}{5k}}$$

Is this correct ?
 
It looks good:smile:

ehild
 
Thanks .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K