The period for small oscillations of a system

In summary: So the answer is that the moment about point ##O## is given by ##\sum M_{O}=-k\left ( b\sin\theta \right )\left ( b\cos\theta \right )-k\left ( 2b\sin\theta \right )\left ( 2b\cos\theta \right )-\underbrace{\left ( 3mgb\sin\theta \right )\left ( 3b\cos\theta \right )}_{\mathit{Why \ shouldn't \ this \ be \ included?}}-\frac{5k}{9M}=0##
  • #1
zeralda21
119
1

Homework Statement



See picture :


PD7JKjk.jpg


Homework Equations



##\sum M_{O}=I_{O}\ddot{\theta }##



The Attempt at a Solution



Consider the free-body diagram associated with an arbitrary positive angular displacement ##\theta##; The moment about point ##O## is given by

##\sum M_{O}=-k\left ( b\sin\theta \right )\left ( b\cos\theta \right )-k\left ( 2b\sin\theta \right )\left ( 2b\cos\theta \right )-\underbrace{\left ( 3mgb\sin\theta \right )\left ( 3b\cos\theta \right )}_{\mathit{Why \ shouldn't \ this \ be \ included?}}##

Further, by the parallel axis theorem, ##I_{0}=\overline{I}+md^2=0+m(3b)^2=9mb^2## and for small oscillations ##\sin\theta\simeq \theta \ \ \wedge \cos\theta\simeq 1## and ##\tau =\frac{2\pi}{\omega _{n}}=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}##. BUT why does not the mass of the sphere contribute to the moment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The springs are stretched initially to keep the rod and mass horizontal, so the torque of gravity is balanced by the torque of the tensions in the springs. You only need to take into account the additional torques if you displace the mass from the equilibrium. The torque of gravity does not change if the displacement is small as it is proportional to the cosine of the angle.

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #3
Hello ehild

ehild said:
The springs are stretched initially to keep the rod and mass horizontal, so the torque of gravity is balanced by the torque of the tensions in the springs.

Why should both the springs be stretched in the equilibrium position ? Either the upper one should be stretched or the lower one should be compressed or may be both the conditions hold simultaneously .

Am I right ?

Let the lower spring be compressed by x1 and upper stretched by x2 in equilibrium .Then,

For translational equilibrium , kx1+kx2 = mg

For rotational equilibrium kx1b+kx2(2b) = mg(3b)

Solving the above ,we get x2 = 2mg/k and x1 = -mg/k .

What does minus sign in x1 = -mg/k signify ?
 
  • #4
Tanya Sharma said:
Hello ehild



Why should both the springs be stretched in the equilibrium position ? Either the upper one should be stretched or the lower one should be compressed or may be both the conditions hold simultaneously .

Am I right ?

Let the lower spring be compressed by x1 and upper stretched by x2 in equilibrium .

By "stretched" I meant that the springs are under tension (well, not necessarily both). You do not know the relaxed lengths. And it can happen that both are really stretched.

Tanya Sharma said:
Then,

For translational equilibrium , kx1+kx2 = mg
That is not true. You ignored the force of the pivot.

Tanya Sharma said:
For rotational equilibrium kx1b+kx2(2b) = mg(3b)

That is correct.
Tanya Sharma said:
Solving the above ,we get x2 = 2mg/k and x1 = -mg/k .

What does minus sign in x1 = -mg/k signify ?
As the first equation is not valid you can not determine x1 and x2.
 
  • #5
As always you are right :smile: .

Writing torque equation,

$$ M(3b)^2\ddotθ = -[k(x_1+bsinθ)(bcosθ)+k(x_2+2bsinθ)(2bcosθ) - mg(3b)] $$

Now ## kx_1(bcosθ)+kx_2(2bcosθ) ≈ mg(3b) ##

$$ 9Mb^2\ddotθ = -[k(bsinθ)(bcosθ)+k(2bsinθ)(2bcosθ)] $$

Applying approximations ,

$$ 9Mb^2\ddotθ = -[k(bsinθ)(bcosθ)+k(2bsinθ)(2bcosθ)] $$

$$ 9Mb^2\ddotθ = -5kb^2θ$$

$$ \ddotθ = -\frac{5k}{9M}θ$$

$$ \omega = \sqrt{\frac{5k}{9M}}$$

$$ T = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{9M}{5k}}$$

Is this correct ?
 
  • #6
It looks good:smile:

ehild
 
  • #7
Thanks .
 
Back
Top