What is the true nature of the physics of the lever?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter 123learn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lever Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics of the lever, emphasizing its fundamental role in understanding complex systems, including strange attractors. The participant, dedaNoe, presents a mathematical formulation for lever dynamics: F'=Fsoc(a)-Dsin(a) and D'=Fsin(a)+Dcos(a), suggesting a connection between lever mechanics and chaos theory. The conversation highlights the importance of exploring the broader implications of lever physics rather than confining it to simplistic interpretations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with chaos theory and strange attractors
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical modeling in physics
  • Experience with simulation tools for dynamic systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical principles behind strange attractors
  • Explore advanced dynamics of levers using simulations
  • Study the relationship between chaos theory and classical mechanics
  • Investigate the applications of lever physics in complex systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and engineers interested in the intersection of classical mechanics and chaos theory, as well as anyone looking to deepen their understanding of lever dynamics and its broader implications in nature.

123learn
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm back again. My physics of the lever is better than any other.

All of physics, even Newtonian mechanics stumble upon
The Physics Of The LEVER!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
me & sexwish, we are one

hi,

I tauhght I was banned so I preregistered under dedaNoe.

How are this attractors, on the page you provided, physics related?
 
Lama said:
Hi sexwish,

First, you have a very nice website.
With a nice language feature! :biggrin: :wink:
 
My law for dynamics of the lever was:

F'=Fsoc(a)-Dsin(a) and D'=Fsin(a)+Dcos(a)

It is a sort of linear attractor, right?

Have you seen my simulation?
www.geocities.com/dedaNoe/_files/particle_sim.zip
For binary dept = 2 it's simple, two weights lever...
For binary dept = 14 it's highly complex, chaotic lever...

But can we, please, stick to my Physics Of The Lever instead of jumping to other theories (chaos theory)?
 
But the most phenomena in nature are complex, so why should we stick in the trivial side of the Physics Of The Lever, instead of exploring any possible state of it?

If you clime that the Physics Of The Lever is a fundamental law of nature, then, in my opinion, you cannot limit your research to some limited side of it.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K