The Real Science Gap: An Overview

  • Thread starter Thread starter twofish-quant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gap Science
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the perceived "science gap" in the context of job prospects for PhD graduates in the United States, particularly in relation to academia and industry. Participants explore the implications of the article shared, addressing the differences between pure science and engineering, the value of PhDs in various sectors, and the broader economic context affecting these fields.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the lack of attractive job prospects in science may deter individuals from pursuing it, contrasting this with fields like medicine where financial incentives exist.
  • Others argue that while engineering jobs are still available, the number of engineering graduates may exceed those in science, complicating the job market dynamics.
  • A participant highlights a potential brain drain of PhD holders moving to countries like China for better opportunities, linking this to funding and governmental support for science.
  • There is a discussion about the role of government funding in science, with some asserting that it is heavily influenced by the desire to maintain US global dominance.
  • Concerns are raised about the assumptions students make when entering PhD programs, particularly the expectation of securing academic positions post-graduation.
  • Some participants question whether the situation is the same for specialized fields like particle theory, indicating a need for further exploration of this issue.
  • There is a sentiment that while PhDs are valued in various sectors, many graduates are finding themselves in non-traditional roles outside their field of study.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the causes of the science gap or the implications for PhD graduates. Disagreements exist regarding the sufficiency of job opportunities in engineering versus pure science, the impact of government funding, and the expectations of PhD students.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various statistics and articles to support their claims, but there are limitations in the assumptions made about job markets and the definitions of success in academia versus industry. The discussion reflects a complex interplay of economic, educational, and societal factors that remain unresolved.

  • #91
Diracula said:
Define 'doing well'. Because I'm pretty sure I disagree.

Doing well means that getting a some that gets you a middle class standard of living without too much effort.

In a "really bad" economy, do all degrees perform equally well with regards to finding a job? Like would I be equally likely to get a job with a BS in engineering vs. a BS in sociology? Do you have a reference to support this?

I'm making a guess based on what I've read about the Great Depression. One problem with looking for references and statistics is that getting references for something that hasn't happened yet is pretty hard.

Basically, it's a lot easier to find funding because there is an immediate benefit to people if you do something that leads to the development of better cancer treatments vs. finding funding to come up with a new test for string theory.

It is, but if funding gets cut anyone, you are pretty much screwed. If you want to see that happen, just read the news. It's not a prediction, its what's happening right now.

You think the risk of putting in 100 hours a week for 6 years and THEN working retail afterwards because everyone hates physics PhDs is good?

Yes. See the posts by ParticleGrrl. The problem is that the location where physics jobs are is very dependent on location, and if you have a constraint that prevents you from moving, then you may well have to find a job that doesn't use a physics Ph.D.

You are thinking too much in terms of statistics and probabilities. What you'll often find is that there is some special issue that keeps those from applying. If I tell you that most physicists can make a lot of money, and those jobs are in NYC, but you have to stay in San Diego, then the statistics are pretty useless for you.

But I don't particularly want to manage a Walmart. Which is a problem if that's all I can get after spending 6 years at 100 hours a week getting a phd in particle physics.

It's easier to get what you want, if you are flexible about what you want. It helps a lot if people keep an open mind about what's out there.

What should these 2 kids do, respectively?

Sorry. It's not my place to tell people what to do. I try *very* hard not to tell people what they should do, because I'm not them. What I can do is to provide information and then people can make their own decisions on what to do.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
5K